User talk:Shonyx/Archive

This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

MrOllie

Post on MrOllie's talkpage one more time for any reason and you will be blocked for harassment. Bishonen | tålk 14:06, 2 February 2024 (UTC).

test

Sinead Onyx Shalomie ☮️ (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 00:46, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

?

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Hermosa–San Jose Transmission Line and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 14:53, 3 February 2024 (UTC)

test2

Hello! Shalomie 👩🏿‍🦱 (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 14:27, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Edits at the Teahouse

Hello, Shalomie. It's good that you're so enthusiastic; but your recent edits at the Teahouse do not seem very helpful:

this one is apparently asking a question without asking a question
this one is answering a question that, while not completely clear, was directing to another discussion, and

and this one and this one seem to have nothing to do with the question being asked; Please slow down a little, and think about what you are posting. Please don't answer questions if you are not sure about what you are saying. ColinFine (talk) 17:48, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Thank you for contributing me. Thanks correcting me! @ColinFine Shalomie 👩🏿‍🦱 (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 03:05, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Archived 3 old talk section

The 3 old talk section of this page is archived. Please go to the February archive. Thanks from — Shalomie ☮️ (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 05:54, 4 February 2024 (UTC)

Archived

Go to February archive

Archived talk pages

Hello, Shonyx,

The purpose of a User talk page is so that editors can communicate with each other. Archiving messages from February, on February 5th, is a little early. You should leave messages on your User talk page for at least a week or a month or so. Archiving as soon as a message is posted prevents the editor from seeing your reply. I hope you can wait a while longer in the future before archiving discussions. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:32, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for contributing me, and thanks for your attention @Liz Shalomie 👩🏿‍🦱 (she/her/hers) •~Talk~• •Contribs• 09:51, 6 February 2024 (UTC)

RfA

I noticed you created Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Shonyx. Please be aware that while there are no requirements for a certain tenure or number of edits to be an administrator, having less than four months experience and less than 400 edits will mean your RfA is guaranteed to fail if you go live with it. These days, it's not at all uncommon for well qualified candidates to have years of experiences and thousands upon thousands of edits. Please read Wikipedia:Guide to requests for adminship and Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates before you consider going live with your RfA. --Hammersoft (talk) 16:08, 9 February 2024 (UTC)