User talk:Clovermoss

Newbie Central

Are you a newcomer to Wikipedia? Here are some resources that you may find helpful:

• There's this video that explains some of the basics of how Wikipedia works. It's aimed more towards readers than editors, but it can give a decent foundation of some things to be aware of before you start editing.
• The Wikipedia Adventure. This is a very basic (and somewhat eccentric) editing tutorial.
• Do you have a conflict-of-interest? Read this guide. It's also important to be aware of an ongoing scam.
• Category:All stub articles which is organized alphabetically and by topic. All these articles could be expanded!
• This is a tutorial for what to know if you wanted to create an article.
• Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Words to watch – advice on phrasing to avoid when editing
• This page is a glossary of different terms used on Wikipedia that can help you understand what people are talking about if you come across an unfamiliar acronym.
• Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Directory – this is a list of wikiprojects. Some are way more active than others but it's a decent way to try and find groups of articles that match your interests. I'm particularly fond of Wikipedia:WikiProject Canada and the associated challenge for improving articles.
• This is the perennial sources list, which can be helpful if you're not sure if something is a reliable source. If it's not on this list and you have concerns, try this noticeboard.
• The Wikipedia Library – this cannot be used until you have 6 months tenure, no active blocks, and 500 edits. However, once you meet the criteria, it is a very useful resource. There is also the Wikipedia:Resource Exchange. I have subscriptions to the Globe and Mail, Toronto Star, and Niagara Falls Review, if you ever want me to verify something for you. I also have access to the James A. Gibson library at Brock University.

Question from ContentCreatorMD (17:00, 14 June 2024)

How do I create a page --ContentCreatorMD (talk) 17:00, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

@ContentCreatorMD: This guide is what you're looking for. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:12, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Jackthemall (18:22, 14 June 2024)

How do I make a page about someone? --Jackthemall (talk) 18:22, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Jackthemall. This page explains how you would go about that. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 18:28, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Aww

Thank you for believing in me :) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 18:32, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

harv/sfn no-target errors in Jehovah's Witnesses

Hi, in Jehovah's Witnesses you have a couple of references, "Chryssides, p. 89" and "Chryssides, p. 116" which are causing harv/sfn no-target errors. There are several works by Chryssides listed in the references (three in the Sources, and more in the actual References). If you could fix these that would be appreciated. DuncanHill (talk) 14:45, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

@DuncanHill: Sorry about that. I just added the missing year to two sources with the page numbers you listed. Did I miss any others? Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:50, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks, it's removed the article from the error category. DuncanHill (talk) 14:51, 15 June 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from soapboxing

People who openly declare Christianity on their profile should probably avoid doing things like "bold editing" articles on MAID. Wiki is an encyclopedia, not a political soapbox. 142.160.101.97 (talk) 08:05, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi, may I ask why you think my edits are political soapboxing? I assume you're referring to Talk:Euthanasia in Canada#My recent bold edits since you've recently made a bunch of edits to that page. I ask that you generally focus on content and not the contributor – it's particularly important when interacting with others who may have alternate perspectives than your own. I'm open to the idea that the article could be better but you don't have to insult people to bring up concerns. For a start, maybe you could explain what exactly your concerns are with my actual editing or more broadly, about the article in general (there's a substantial part of the article content that I had absolutely nothing to do with). To be clear, what I had in mind of a possible split article was something like "Legal history of euthanasia in Canada". I trimmed a lot of the tangentially related content because otherwise a tag regarding article size would've been appropriate.

By the way, I haven't believed in God since I was 13. I don't think this magically makes me unbiased in the subject matter. It's a bit difficult to be completely indifferent when such legislation impacts me on a personal level, which is why I'm trying to be a bit more considerate to said concerns even though I think my recent edits are reasonable. I don't see why you'd assume someone's religious beliefs makes them inherently unsuitable for editing any given topic area. There's 2.2 billion Christians and it's inappropriate to suggest that everyone in that group is somehow incapable of editing neutrally. Also, bold editing is generally encouraged. If people have problems with said edits, discussion about them often takes place. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 08:38, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

A belated apology

Hello Clovermoss, an RfA discussion about whether a certain oppose is valid has prompted me to remember the time I was on the opposite end of a similar dispute at your RfA a few months ago. This might seem a bit out of the blue, but on reflection I believe I was not only wrong on the issue at hand but I expressed myself in a way that was too harsh towards you. Sorry. I'm not sure how you felt about it exactly, but I remember you wrote a fairly long response to me and another editor who'd expressed a similar concern, so you must have been taking it at least somewhat seriously. – Teratix ₵ 10:25, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

@Teratix: Apology accepted. Surprisingly enough you're not the only one to come here lately to express the same idea. I'll offer the same advice I did then: it's not uncommon to change your mind about something and don't be too hard on yourself. I will admit that your opinion stung a little at the time, probably because I'd seen you across the project and otherwise had a good impression. That sort of thing makes rejection a wee bit harder. If you're curious about what I felt like in regards to RfA, I recently wrote a huge essay about it. Feel free to share your thoughts on that. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:19, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Moosleute

You are right, I was interested in the Moss People. For two reasons. One. Plants. Two. Ich spreche ein wenig Deutsch. Hitting several of my interests at once. 🌿MtBotany (talk) 15:42, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

@MtBotany: Yeah, I was reading a fantasy novel where a character made an offhand reference to a moss maiden and I was like... wait a second, really? I need to look that up right now! I was so excited when I came across the article for moss people and I'm glad you like it too. :) The more obscure parts of the project are always fascinating to find. While you're here, any chance you'd be willing to be share your love of plant editing? I'm looking for experienced editors to interview here. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from I want a dad (05:12, 19 June 2024)

Where can I start to make an article? --I want a dad (talk) 05:12, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi I want a dad, what you're looking for is this page. While you're here, I think it's a good idea to consider that you might want to change your username to something that makes it easier to collaborate with other people. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 15:38, 19 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Avneesh Srivastav (06:33, 20 June 2024)

How do I create Page? --Avneesh Srivastav (talk) 06:33, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

@Avneesh Srivastav: You'll want to read this guide. Keep in mind that creating articles can be a bit of a difficult process and it may be best to work your way up to it. I have some additional resources here you might find useful. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:48, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Tincee Hema (12:57, 20 June 2024)

helloo i added one article in wikipedia but that is in my user page...i need to make it public....how can i do that...? please help me to make the articles public... --Tincee Hema (talk) 12:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Tincee Hema, I moved your draft to Draft:Ullas Chemban. I also made some slight formatting changes and a button that will let you submit your draft when you think it's ready to be reviewed by another editor. You have the overall structure done quite well, but it's important to cite reliable sources supporting these statements, as verifiability is a crucial aspect of Wikipedia. Another factor to consider is that we have specific guidelines on notability within a Wikipedia specific context. If a reviewer isn't certain that your draft meets those requirements, it's incredibly unlikely to be accepted. If you're unsure of how to cite your sources, try this guide. Feel free to come back here if you have any further questions. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 17:57, 20 June 2024 (UTC)

Pings

Moved from Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship

Looks like my unconventional method of fixing pings doesn't work. It's possible to read this page and come to the conclusion that an alternative solution is to properly link a user and signature in a new edit. [1] It looks like a new line is actually required. [2] Anyways, Red-tailed hawk, I meant to ping you earlier. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:51, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

@Clovermoss: Interestingly, the ping worked when editing your comment in user talk space but not in your regular user space. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:22, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

So [3] does work even though everything suggests it doesn't. Courtesy ping to Novem Linguae who understands tech stuff better than I do. I'm also cool with this whole side conversation being moved to my talk page because it's somewhat tangential to the issue at hand. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 12:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC) Note: I have done so now. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 23:27, 21 June 2024 (UTC)

I did some reading of the underlying PHP code, (and some percussive testing) it seems like a ping should show up if the following are true

• The diffing algorithm thinks you added a new block (for example, when you view Clovermoss's edit in diff mode, the diffing algorithm puts it in a new block since Colvermoss also deleted a new line just above their comment, whereas this edit is considered to be a modification of text and not a new line addition)
• Needs to have a valid wikilink to a username in the same new block
• Must contain a raw signature while saving (i.e. ~~~~)

Sohom (talk) 14:40, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for figuring out the difference. I assumed it had something to do with trying it out in user/user talk page but the removal of a line makes sense (I didn't even realize I did that at the time). Do you think anything should be added to Template:Ping fix to make this clearer? Or that because Help:Fixing failed pings says to add a new line that this is unnessecary? To be quite frank, I never realized my unconventional method here didn't work. I vaguely recall someone telling me to do it years ago (or I misunderstood what they were saying and somehow came to the conclusion). No one's pointed out that this doesn't work until now. That goes to show you can always learn something new. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 16:16, 22 June 2024 (UTC)

I think the current docs are mostly fine, mostly cause they do mention adding a new line to the new message. Wrt to not knowing if a mention occurs,there is a option to enable getting a notification when a mention fails to go through in your preferences (Special > Preferences > Notifications > Failed mentions). Might be useful to document that in the docs. Sohom (talk) 01:11, 23 June 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, missed the ping originally. I haven't tested as thoroughly as Sohom, but I have noticed pings tend to not work if I am modifying or deleting a paragraph rather than adding a paragraph. For any edit where I want pings to work, I try to make sure that I am only adding paragraphs. And of course they must be freshly signed and contain a link to a user page (or user talk page?). Hope that helps. –Novem Linguae (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Nifemi125 on User:Nifemi125 (05:23, 24 June 2024)

Hello please how do I create a page --Nifemi125 (talk) 05:23, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Nifemi125, read this page. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2024 (UTC)

Assist on this please

Greetings sir, I’ve created this some weeks ago, and i been it’s a notable article as some editors has checked and patrolled on it, it meets Wikipedias GNS, please help review Kingdom Achievers Award, thanks. Madeforall1 (talk) 00:14, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Hi Madeforall1, I'm not a "sir". Anyways, I'd suggest just being patient when it comes to a review of your article. There's a backlog of more than 11,000 articles so it might take awhile. I figured it might help to know it's not just you who is waiting. Feel free to come back if you have any further questions. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 08:15, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Dear talk page watchers

If anyone wants to help expand Rock 'n Play beyond mere stub status, it'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:03, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Tried expanding, any feedback is highly appreciated :) Rectech enthusiast (talk) 07:51, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@Rectech enthusiast: I do have some feedback. Try not to take it too harshly, I was pleasantly surprised to see a newbie editing an article I just started. Thank you for the additional sentence and source about what the sleeper was actually designed to do. No one owns article content but people can still find it difficult to be bold regardless. While I appreciate your desire to divide the content into sections, articles do need to have a lead. This lead should summarize what's been written about a topic so omitting any information about the recalls and infant deaths until later in the article isn't the best idea. It's a core aspect of the product's history. I also don't think an entire section needs to exist for the one sentence that's there so far about the Safe Sleep Act. If you don't already, I'd encourage you to have the article on your watchlist. I'm likely to edit the page again later today and it can be insightful to watch other editors in action. I did it all the time when I was a newbie. :) Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:30, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Understood, Thank you for the feedback! Will keep this under my watch for sure. I read the article again, Surely looks better now :D Rectech enthusiast (talk) 11:09, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Admin's Barnstar
	Hey Clovermoss, Thank you for your contributions and efforts on Wikimedia. I really appreciated! Youknowwhoistheman (talk) 05:54, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Question from Rectech enthusiast (07:02, 26 June 2024)

Hi there! I was wondering if I can start writing articles? I read the guidelines but are there any best practices to find topics to write on which already don't exist on wiki? --Rectech enthusiast (talk) 07:02, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

@Rectech enthusiast: Wikipedia:Requested articles and Wikipedia:WikiProject Women in Red are places where you can find requests for articles to be written. Just make sure there's enough sources to meet Wikipedia's notability standards before you do. I typically suggest new editors learn the ropes by expanding articles first. Category:All stub articles can be sorted by topic and can help you find some inspiration. Feel free to come back if you have any other questions. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 11:35, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Hmmm..Yes. In think I should start with expanding for now, I used to work on wiki but it has been looong. I will restart with the expansion ones first for now Rectech enthusiast (talk) 11:10, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

WikiCup 2024 July newsletter

The third round of the 2024 WikiCup ended on 28 June. As with Round 2, this round was competitive: each of the 16 contestants who advanced to Round 4 scored at least 256 points.

The following editors all scored more than 400 points in Round 3:

• Generalissima (submissions) with 1,059 points, mostly from 1 featured article on DeLancey W. Gill, 11 good articles, 18 did you know nominations, and dozens of reviews;
• Skyshifter (submissions) with 673 points, mostly from 2 featured articles on Worlds (Porter Robinson album) and I'm God, 5 good articles, and 2 did you know nominations;
• Sammi Brie (submissions) with 557 points, mostly from 1 featured article on KNXV-TV, 5 good articles, and 8 did you know nominations; and
• AryKun (submissions) with 415 points, mostly from 1 featured article on Great cuckoo-dove, with a high number of bonus points from that article.

The full scores for round 3 can be seen here. So far this year, competitors have gotten 28 featured articles, 38 featured lists, 240 good articles, 92 in the news credits, and at least 285 did you know credits. They have conducted 279 featured article reviews, as well as 492 good article reviews and peer reviews, and have added 22 articles to featured topics and good topics.

Remember that any content promoted after 28 June but before the start of Round 4 can be claimed during Round 4, which starts on 1 July at 00:00 (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether for a good article, featured content, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed.

If you would like to learn more about rules and scoring for the 2024 WikiCup, please see this page. Further questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup and the judges (Cwmhiraeth (talk · contribs), Epicgenius (talk · contribs), and Frostly (talk · contribs)) are reachable on their talk pages. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:29, 29 June 2024 (UTC)

Women in Red July 2024

Women in Red | July 2024, Volume 10, Issue 7, Numbers 293, 294, 311, 312, 313 Online events: New: Translation contest 2024 | Science Fiction and Fantasy | Women in Sports Continuing: #1day1woman | Education (year-long initiative) Announcements from other communities Wiki Loves Sport 2024 22 July - 22 September Tip of the month: A foreign language biography does not guarantee notability for English Wikipedia. Check the guidelines before you start. Other ways to participate: Become a member. You can always opt-out of notifications. Join the conversations on our talkpage. Help us plan future events and add any general ideas on developing the project. Follow us on social media: Instagram | Pinterest | Twitter/X

--Lajmmoore (talk 14:27, 30 June 2024 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Problematic IP

Hi, could you please block User:184.146.127.118 as disruptive editing/NOTHERE? Their edits consist pretty much exclusively of vandalism, insults, and more recently, sexual comments towards other users. Thanks! GrayStorm^{(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.)} 02:49, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

@GrayStorm: Done. I also revdelled some stuff. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Thank you very much :). GrayStorm^{(Complaints Dept.|My Contribs.)} 03:07, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Chaput v Romain

Hello, Clovermoss. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Chaput v Romain, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:06, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Your question

This discussion may also be related to your question about when and how its appropriate to ask about religious affiliation Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#2021 Canadian church burnings. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 01:52, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

@Horse Eye's Back: If you think it's relevant, feel free to tell ArbCom about it. I'm not familiar with that discussion in particular but I'll read it. You might find one of the discussions linked by another editor at the clarification page interesting because I actually started it. [4] Feel free to tell me what you think. I'm generally willing to hear people out even if I don't always agree with them. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:16, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

It seems as relevent as the conversation I was involved in, my general opinion is that a lot of people who would be negatively impacted by a strict interpretation of COI in regards to religion are arguing for a permissive interpretation of COI in regards to religion. That brings up a whole additional layer of COI which I'm not sure we're ready to talk about. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 02:25, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I will say that I've participated in a surprising amount of conversations about this topic and the general vibe I've recieved is that these questions are generally inappropriate but people also aren't okay with the very strict interpretation of it's never okay to ask. There's a reason I linked Church of Scientology editing on Wikipedia. Anyways, I hope the clarification request helps with this sort of situation in the future. If it doesn't, the community will have to have some broad discussion about it eventually because it keeps coming up in different venues and in a variety of contexts. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 02:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

I have expanded the request for clarification as well as I know how. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 03:26, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 July 2024

• News and notes: WMF board elections and fundraising updates

• Special report: Wikimedia Movement Charter ratification vote underway, new Council may surpass power of Board

• In focus: How the Russian Wikipedia keeps it clean despite having just a couple dozen administrators

• Discussion report: Wikipedians are hung up on the meaning of Madonna

• In the media: War and information in war and politics

• Sister projects: On editing Wikisource

• Obituary: Hanif Al Husaini, Salazarov, Hyacinth, and PirjanovNurlan

• Opinion: Etika: a Pop Culture Champion

• Gallery: Spokane Willy's photos

• Op-Ed: Why you should not vote in the 2024 WMF BoT elections

• Crossword: On a day of independence, beat crosswords into crossploughshares

• Humour: A joke

• Cobwebs: Counting to a billion — manuscripts don't burn

• Recent research: Is Wikipedia Politically Biased? Perhaps

• Traffic report: Talking about you and me, and the games people play

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Question from Tarnika Hazra on Philip Wollen (10:42, 5 July 2024)

I want to start with Bengali Language, please. --Tarnika Hazra (talk) 10:42, 5 July 2024 (UTC)

Hi Tarnika Hazra, it's unclear what you're asking me here. If you're looking for the article we have on the Bengali language, click that link. If you're looking for that language edition of Wikipedia, that would be here [5]. Clovermoss🍀 (talk) 14:14, 5 July 2024 (UTC)