User talk:Ориенталист
|
there is a lot of sheer politicized nonsense in the article on the Russian conquest of Siberia, I just erased a small part of it. It's really outrageous claiming that Russians did get diseases into Siberia when in reality it was the Mongol invasion that brought about those diseases not only to Siberia but to Russia and Europe as well. It's a plain scum to claim how many people died there. They always were small nomadic tribes, illiterate, there isn't and can't be any reliable data on their numbers. The fact is that in many cases Russians preserved those people from extinction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirosias (talk • contribs) 15:23, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
there is a lot of sheer politicized nonsense in the article on the Russian conquest of Siberia, I just erased a small part of it. It's really outrageous claiming that Russians did get diseases into Siberia when in reality it was the Mongol invasion that brought about those diseases not only to Siberia but to Russia and Europe as well. It's a plain scum to claim how many people died there. They always were small nomadic tribes, illiterate, there weren't and couldn't be any reliable data on their numbers. The fact is that in many cases Russians preserved those people from extinction. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kirosias (talk • contribs) 15:26, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
- Вы о чём вообще? При чём тут монгольское нашествие 13 века? В Сибири не было оспы до прихода русских, об этом и речь. Ничего политизированного там нет, источники стоят, не нравится ваше личное мнение. Каракорум (talk) 15:29, 22 May 2020 (UTC)
Please use English in edit summaries
[edit]Please use English in edit summaries, as otherwise most editors won't be able to understand what you wrote.--Staberinde (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- Of course you right. I used russian, because my opponent knows it. Каракорум (talk) 13:29, 1 March 2020 (UTC)
- "Opponent"? Whoa, WP:BATTLEGROUND. I know you're talking about me. Knock it off. Your ethnocentric slavic nationalism may be tolerated on Russian Wikipedia, but it is not welcome here.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Firstly it's not about you. Secondly don't chase me, you were not invited to my page. I understand that you are defending Devlet, but essentially doing the same pushing as he. I mean the Crimean Tatar topic. Каракорум (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not chasing you. Your edits showed up on may watchlist because many of the pages you edited were on my watchlist. Naturally, I saw your edits, and I was surprised that you are editing enwiki. Second, I do not have to be "invited" to your page to confront you about your behavior. Third, this has nothing to do with Devlet Geray. I disagree with him a lot, and I myself sometimes don't like his edits. I am confronting you because of YOUR behavior, not anything to do with Devlet. Fourth, my edits on Crimean Tatar history are well-supported by fact and the use of mainstream sources supported by international consensus, not fringe sources by Russian nationalists used for slander. As a Wikipedia editor I have the right to be a productive contributer to the subject. You do not have the right to bulldoze all things Crimean Tatar on Wikipedia just because of your nationalist grudges.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? What am I taking off? I am making minor edits. In articles not related to Crimean topics, I made several edits, after which Devlet came and canceled them without comment. The fact that he was blocked in Russian is his personal problems. In addition, as far as I remember in Ruviki, you constantly complained that someone writes on your discussion page, although he was not called. And then you have the right? Double standards? Do you blame me for nationalism? In this case, I blame you. Каракорум (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- The problem with the person posting on my talkpage wasn't that they arrived without a ping. The problem was that they came to complain about a months-old situation that I no longer wanted to be involved in. I clearly expressed the fact that I did not care about which way the page was edited, and asked them to leave, yet they still pursued. It is not customary to beat a dead horse, and it is unacceptable to bother users about months-old editwars they have repeatedly expressed disinterest in. On the other hand, your actions here are very recent. As for nationalism - writing articles about accomplished people (pilots, writers, engineers, scientists) of one's own nation out of pride is VERY different from writing articles to disparage other nations, attempt to justify marginalization of others, minimize the extent of it, or going on a deletion spree for articles about a particular nation. If you were to be PRODUCTIVE were just improving articles about famous Russians - power to you, I won't stop you. But when you make a point to putting down other peoples as part of a sick superiority complex, such behavior will not be tolerated.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Personally, you can think anything. Given your non-neutrality in this matter, I do not see the need to prove anything to you. Каракорум (talk) 14:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Do you expect me to think you are neutral either?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- This topic is called use English in the comments. I used Russian in an article where I waged the Devlet revision war, and this article was not on your list. So why are you here if there was no talk about you at all. Do you want to avenge me for Devlet in Russian? Каракорум (talk) 15:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Do you expect me to think you are neutral either?--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Personally, you can think anything. Given your non-neutrality in this matter, I do not see the need to prove anything to you. Каракорум (talk) 14:57, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- The problem with the person posting on my talkpage wasn't that they arrived without a ping. The problem was that they came to complain about a months-old situation that I no longer wanted to be involved in. I clearly expressed the fact that I did not care about which way the page was edited, and asked them to leave, yet they still pursued. It is not customary to beat a dead horse, and it is unacceptable to bother users about months-old editwars they have repeatedly expressed disinterest in. On the other hand, your actions here are very recent. As for nationalism - writing articles about accomplished people (pilots, writers, engineers, scientists) of one's own nation out of pride is VERY different from writing articles to disparage other nations, attempt to justify marginalization of others, minimize the extent of it, or going on a deletion spree for articles about a particular nation. If you were to be PRODUCTIVE were just improving articles about famous Russians - power to you, I won't stop you. But when you make a point to putting down other peoples as part of a sick superiority complex, such behavior will not be tolerated.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:46, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? What am I taking off? I am making minor edits. In articles not related to Crimean topics, I made several edits, after which Devlet came and canceled them without comment. The fact that he was blocked in Russian is his personal problems. In addition, as far as I remember in Ruviki, you constantly complained that someone writes on your discussion page, although he was not called. And then you have the right? Double standards? Do you blame me for nationalism? In this case, I blame you. Каракорум (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not chasing you. Your edits showed up on may watchlist because many of the pages you edited were on my watchlist. Naturally, I saw your edits, and I was surprised that you are editing enwiki. Second, I do not have to be "invited" to your page to confront you about your behavior. Third, this has nothing to do with Devlet Geray. I disagree with him a lot, and I myself sometimes don't like his edits. I am confronting you because of YOUR behavior, not anything to do with Devlet. Fourth, my edits on Crimean Tatar history are well-supported by fact and the use of mainstream sources supported by international consensus, not fringe sources by Russian nationalists used for slander. As a Wikipedia editor I have the right to be a productive contributer to the subject. You do not have the right to bulldoze all things Crimean Tatar on Wikipedia just because of your nationalist grudges.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- Firstly it's not about you. Secondly don't chase me, you were not invited to my page. I understand that you are defending Devlet, but essentially doing the same pushing as he. I mean the Crimean Tatar topic. Каракорум (talk) 14:18, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
- "Opponent"? Whoa, WP:BATTLEGROUND. I know you're talking about me. Knock it off. Your ethnocentric slavic nationalism may be tolerated on Russian Wikipedia, but it is not welcome here.--PlanespotterA320 (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ITN recognition for Aslan Byutukayev
[edit]
On 24 January 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Aslan Byutukayev, which you updated. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. SpencerT•C 16:22, 24 January 2021 (UTC)
After reading more information concerning the result/outcome of this war, I feel we need to re-assess the result. I think a resolution like the Battle of Jamrud which indicates a result of disputed with a link to a paragraph in the article which discusses the different results.
I will start a discussion on the article talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 19:38, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
The book, Janet Martin, Medieval Russia: 980-1584, page 356, does not state Russian victory. Do you have a different source that states a Russian victory for the Russo-Turkish war?
I have posted some information concerning Ottoman goals for this war on the article talk page. --Kansas Bear (talk) 21:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)