User talk:ナガヰ

This is ナガヰ's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

largely unsourced.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:ナガヰ/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, ナガヰ! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

An article with the following message is accepted: "This article includes a list of general references, but it lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations. Please help to improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (March 2022) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)" This article had ZERO inline citations for six months yet remained published. I remedied the situation by adding an excellent section including 5 inline citations and was immediately declined. Your hypocrisy, bigotry, racism and pseudo-intellectualism is disgusting. You have no standards beyond a blind infatuation with ignorance. ナガヰ (talk) 07:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks October 2022

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at User talk:ナガヰ. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 07:49, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I commented on content, not contributors, as I am the sole contributor. The content was hypocrisy, juxtaposing "an excessive amount of intricate detail" with "additional references meeting these criteria should be added", bigotry "not been accepted", racism by claiming 5 predominately Asian sources are "largely unsourced." in the context of an accepted article which without my contributions "lacks sufficient corresponding inline citations" and pseudo-intellectual in declaring hundreds of pages of published, independent secondary sources as "just passing mentions) about the subject" when the titles reveal the subject to be the central focus of the entire works. Why this hypocritical, bigoted, racist, pseudo-intellectual attempt to portray "Paekche of Korea and the Origin of Yamato Japan", "Nihongi: Chronicles of Japan from the Earliest Times to A.D. 697" and "Japan in the Chinese dynastic histories: Later Han through Ming dynasties" as ""just passing mentions) about the subject" of the Six Dynasties Theory? What single source does Theroadiswrong allege would be more "significant coverage". Theroadiswrong has intentionally attempted to incite conflict by a personal attack under the falsest pretexts with actions promoting ignorance and exclusion of valid contributions. In order to be a contributor, one must contribute, and Theroadiswrong only detracts without contributing anything but an infatuation with hate speech. ナガヰ (talk) 13:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Theroadiswrong only detracts without contributing anything but an infatuation with hate speech." is a personal attack, please stay calm and try and explain what you are attempting to achieve in your sand box, because it is not at all clear. Theroadislong (talk) 14:05, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Likewise, an English version the existing Spanish Wikipedia page on the Republic of the Sierra Madre was specifically requested, no matter how a hateful racist under the (ab)user-name Mississippi Burning tries to say it was my own original content or not related to user interest, it was SPECIFICALLY LISTED among desired topic I suppose this is me. I did not delete the draft, I deleted your user page which was completely inappropriate for an encyclopedia. I decliend the draft because that was an essay, not an article. But please do keep it up and you'll lose all privileges to edit. Star Mississippi 00:59, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. `Calling another user "a hateful racist' is totally unacceptable. Theroadislong (talk) 20:47, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit summary "babysitting some troll who can't deal with abbreviations like "ibid" is another personal attack, please stop and start assuming good faith of reviewers. Theroadislong (talk) 07:26, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

on a 31 hour vacation for exactly that. Star Mississippi 16:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 14:24, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Republic of the Sierra Madre (October 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Star Mississippi were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Republic of the Sierra Madre and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 20:21, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:ナガヰ

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:ナガヰ requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Star Mississippi 20:23, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because I think he's trying to explain why he's editing like this. I presume he was an ip editor and created basically half of Dynasty replacement theory --Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 20:44, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have been hastily attacked by at least two trolls for posting translations and links on two separate pages that were specifically requested of me. It is refreshing to see that someone is not favoring mindless censorship here. I appreciate your concern on my behalf and in favor of all who wish to improve Wikipedia. ナガヰ (talk) 20:48, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here) --ナガヰ (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)The references I posted were expressly solicited by other users and my inline references are from published authors specifically focusing on the subject for over 100 pages (in more than one source) despite false hateful allegations that they comprised only a "passing mention" of the subject matter. The suggestion to spin off to a new page was posted on my edit and I promptly and difinitively replied with directly quoted evidence proven the falseness of deceitful allegations. Likewise, an English version the existing Spanish Wikipedia page on the Republic of the Sierra Madre was specifically requested, no matter how a hateful racist under the (ab)user-name Mississippi Burning tries to say it was my own original content or not related to user interest, it was SPECIFICALLY LISTED among desired topics. The original page on Spanish Wikipedia had no reference, but was deemed adequate. I went and researched and even added a reference and am being threatened with speedy deletion for doing so. This environment of fear and censorship is detrimental to any community whose goals are not global nuclear destruction in a Nazi holocaust.ナガヰ (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I exist

I appreciate your contributions to Dynasty replacement theory especially if you were also the ip editors, but I still exist contrary to what you said here https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Dynasty_replacement_theory&oldid=1113458287 I think the content needs trimming and better formatting to be easily readable for English speakers. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 20:54, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Kyushu Dynasty Theory

Would you be interested in helping me with this article? Draft:Kyushu Dynasty Theory. I saw you mentioned Takehiko Furuta in Dynasty replacement theory, and this draft article is about his theory. It seems like an article you might be interested in improving. Immanuelle 💗 (please tag me) 20:57, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

yes. Furuta is sharp in some aspects, but I also find grave factual errors in some of his opinions. ナガヰ (talk) 21:03, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:40, 1 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory (October 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Star Mississippi was:

This is duplicate of User:ナガヰ/Sample page. Please pick one version to edit, keeping in mind all relevant policies as they regard to editing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Star Mississippi 01:01, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory (October 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Far too much of the article is unsourced to be placed in Mainspace. please source all claims

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 15:46, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 15:51, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Star Mississippi 16:30, 3 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dynasty replacement theory

You edits (both with this account and the IP address you were previously editing under) to Dynasty replacement theory have been removed. They appear to be a personal essay or an attempt to create an academic paper out of the article. Please note that Wikipedia is not the place to publish essays or academic works. If you wish to publish a paper on this subject, please submit it to an appropriate academic journal. If it is accepted by one that is considered reliable, it's possible it could be used as a reference on Wikipedia in the future. If you wish to make further additions to that article, I suggest discussing any such proposed changes on the talk page first. Thank you! ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 21:09, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate comment removed

Comments such as this are inappropriate for Wikipedia. Please do not make such comments in the future or you may find your editing privileges removed. Thank you. ···日本穣 · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 22:02, 17 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:The Republic of the Sierra Madre

Hello, ナガヰ. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Republic of the Sierra Madre, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Drafts

I see your drafts are gradually being deleted now. If you want them to be preserved and potentially eventually put them into mainspace then make an edit on one whenever you get such a notification as #Concern regarding Draft:The Republic of the Sierra Madre and ideally keep editing the drafts. Immanuelle ❤️💚💙 (please tag me) 21:29, 3 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Republic of the Sierra Madre

Hello, ナガヰ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Republic of the Sierra Madre".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:27, 1 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory

Hello, ナガヰ. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "The Sumyeramikoto six dynasties theory".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 09:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]