User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost

) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi ) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Lightbreather (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm Mattythewhite. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Giorgio Rasulo, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 19:04, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Infobox dates

Hi, when updating club stats in the infobox you should update the |pcupdate= or |club-update= parameter by adding five tildes (~~~~~), which generates the specific time the update was made. Thanks, Mattythewhite (talk) 19:15, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please keep this in mind. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:32, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please take notice of the above. I've just been tidying up after you on various Oxford players. Dave.Dunford (talk) 18:17, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, ") vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because it's a confusing username. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username, or you may simply create a new account for editing. Thank you. JMHamo (talk) 16:21, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at George Baldock. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:53, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Kemar Roofe. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Collins (footballer, born 1986). Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Patrick Hoban, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Danny Hylton. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:12, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at George Baldock. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:38, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Collins (footballer, born 1986). Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:40, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Giorgio Rasulo, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:51, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for resuming the disruptive editing pattern that got you blocked before. Please be advised that the next block will likely be indefinite. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Favonian (talk) 15:33, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Patrick Hoban. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:23, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Danny Hylton. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:26, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Will Hoskins. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Patrick Hoban, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Please refer to User talk:) vjhvvjjhvjviivih ghost#Infobox dates. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:57, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —SMALL JIM 15:21, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]