User talk:103.246.39.46

February 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Deforestation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Deforestation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo was changed by 103.246.39.46 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.92844 on 2014-02-27T07:21:14+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 07:21, 27 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ilyushin Il-76, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Jetstreamer ^Talk 12:17, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

What change?103.246.39.46 (talk) 08:33, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm JPxG. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Committee for the Promotion of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (Saudi Arabia), but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jp×g 05:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Source not needed for this bit.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:02, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did in Committee for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice (Gaza Strip). Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.SunDawn talk 05:04, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gaza is a Palestinian territory you imbecile. You don't remove correct information.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am planning to remove my warning and apologize, but you call me an imbecile. SunDawn talk 05:18, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote that before you wrote your new comment.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:32, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It does not make it right. Attacking other user is never justified. SunDawn talk 05:43, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it does make it right. I call a spade a spade. If you see this as an "attack", that is your problem.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:49, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Dana Wortley. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. jp×g 05:28, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. I will put it up.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:34, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Facebook posts are generally not accepted as WP:RS, but if you want to give it a shot, please enclose a link in <ref> tags (more information on this can be found at {{cite web}}). jp×g 05:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, thanks I will do it now. This is her official page and not a fake page.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:51, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Legal system of Saudi Arabia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. jp×g 08:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Terrorism in France. Lord Belbury (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

It's not unsourced, thanks.103.246.39.46 (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"He drove his truck into many people and also shot at them" is unsourced, and also looks to be untrue: the attacker didn't shoot at the people he drove a truck into. --Lord Belbury (talk) 07:31, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Most captions don't have a reference anyway. And yes, he shot at people too. Then the police shot at him. Read the news again. Thank you.103.246.39.46 (talk) 07:33, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Captions usually aren't referenced because they're repeating content that's covered in more detail in the article, whereas you're dropping an image into articles which otherwise say nothing about the terror attack.

Wikipedia:Verifiability requires that "any material whose verifiability has been challenged or is likely to be challenged, must include an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports the material". If you think the Nice truck attacker was a Muslim, and that he shot at the same people he drove into, that needs a source - the 2016 Nice truck attack article says neither of these things. --Lord Belbury (talk) 07:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you mean. But I never said that he shot at the exact same people. Please don't put words in my mouth. Furthermore, the main article states that he was a Muslim; he became an extremist and had administration for ISIS and other jihadi groups.103.246.39.46 (talk) 07:49, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You wrote "He drove his truck into many people and also shot at them" in captions across many articles, and "He also was shooting at people and police were able to neutralize him" at the Bastille Day articlle: he did not shoot at the people he drove the truck into, he did not shoot at the public. Don't mischaracterise the attack itself, if the only gunfire was directed at police during the standoff. --Lord Belbury (talk) 07:52, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't say that they were all the same people. Please read the main article again. One more thing, police are also people. They are not robots.103.246.39.46 (talk) 07:55, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your first sentence says that he "also shot at" the people he drove a truck into, the second implies that the shooting was indiscriminate. Write with more precision, sticking to what the sources say. --Lord Belbury (talk) 08:20, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You decided to take it the wrong way. And for the last time, police are also people. And you stick to what the main article states. Thanks.103.246.39.46 (talk) 05:27, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Bastille Day shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Lord Belbury (talk) 08:18, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § 103.246.39.46. Thank you. JBchrch talk 15:08, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 07:24, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in Stepney (disambiguation), disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ----Rdp060707|talk 04:52, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

WP:ANI discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The section is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents § 103.246.39.46. Thank you. JBchrch talk 08:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 08:42, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

You just finished a block for edit warring and you go back to edit warring over the exact same thing? If you keep edit warring the blocks will continue getting longer. HighInBC ^{Need help? Just ask.} 08:44, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh no. You and your mates are edit warring. Atleast I tried to discuss on talk. But did you? No.103.246.39.46 (talk) 01:23, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.