Jump to content

User talk:129.127.32.138

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

April 2014

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Reserve requirement has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Information icon Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Reserve requirement with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. --Slazenger (Contact Me) 05:05, 7 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on U.S. Bank Tower (Los Angeles). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Firstly, do not use multiple IP's. Secondly, please ensure you have correct references and write in good English. Thank you David J Johnson (talk) 14:19, 30 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

December 2019

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Adelaide Botanic High School. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 01:51, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

IT IS NOT VANDALISM YOU MORON!! READ the article 129.127.32.138 (talk) 01:54, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Pls provide source to support your content claimed. CASSIOPEIA(talk) 02:08, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No, dont have to. Because there is already enough explanation and sources in the Article. This is a small article and you cannot read it?129.127.32.138 (talk) 02:18, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

Someone using this IP address, 129.127.32.138, has made edits that do not conform to our policies and therefore have been reverted. For more information on this, see Wikipedia's policies on vandalism and limits on acceptable additions. If you'd like to experiment with the syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. If you did not do this, you may wish to consider getting a username to avoid confusion with other editors.

You don't have to log in to read or edit pages on Wikipedia, but creating an account is quick, free, requires no personal information, and has many benefits. Without a username, your IP address is used to identify you.

Some good links for newcomers are:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask the Help Desk, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Again, welcome! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:50, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop and read

[edit]

It appears that you are racing through articles, adding unsourced material, unhelpful edit summaries, ungrammatical content, and removing some quite appropriate content or photos based on your opinion. If you continue this way, you are likely to get yourself banned, so please take some time to read through the guides to Wikipedia editing, and in particular take note of WP:CIVIL when addressing other editors. You have already had a last warning above, so take heed. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:55, 2 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Tell yourself that. You seem to be doing some of those things. And what warning? You're previous message was a 'Welcome message'.129.127.32.138 (talk) 04:43, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
That was a standard welcome message with some useful links, which I posted to throw you a lifeline. Before that you had a block warning, but you have carried on doing damage to Wikipedia that other editors have to waste their time fixing. It's clear from your comments and actions that you don't understand the protocols here. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 04:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Its not a waste of time. You are. Clearly. 129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:03, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:05, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
You are the one vandalising. You should take the time to read, before making accusations like this. Perhaps you should familiarise yourself with this > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Vandalism 129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:09, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Laterthanyouthink, sorry, but I don't see a reason for a final warning. As an admin, I don't find any of their edits blockworthy. I reverted one of their edits because I didn't agree with it, but it wasn't vandalism, and the other edits of theirs I looked at aren't vandalism either. Drmies (talk) 05:17, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
When I reverted the edits, I put sources there too. 129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:19, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sure, but I don't think that material (in that Parkside article) was at all worthy of inclusion... Drmies (talk) 05:20, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. Please see my comment on the talk page, I've taken it there earlier.129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:26, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Drmies, I added that because they had already had a final warning this month (see above). Their additions and deletions of others' material is not justifiable in most cases, often accompanied by inappropriate edit summaries, and (where text is added) ungrammatical and unsourced content. This is degrading the value of some articles, wasting other editors' time and effort that could be better spent on other things, and the attitude of not wanting to pause, read, learn from mistakes and improve is hardly desirable on WP. All I was asking was for them to slow down and also act civilly. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:39, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Time is not wasted. Just because you like to whinge doesnt mean that others are not willing to help. And like I said earlier, when I reverted the edits, I tried to put sources. Also, in a couple of articles, sources are NOT needed, because there already are sources. 129.127.32.138 (talk) 06:48, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disruptive editing, multiple accounts on Nursing

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:31, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hehe, I noticed you typed this on the wrong page. But what 'multiple accounts on Nursing'?.129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:32, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of whether or not this was also you, your edits to Nursing were clearly disruptive, having been reverted by multiple editors, as is this sort of edit. OhNoitsJamie Talk 05:41, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No that was not me. You can use the geolocation feature if you dont believe me. Please dont make accusations like that. Thank you. 129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:51, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
As for the parkside article, I have atleast put good sources and I had taken it to the talk page too.129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:52, 3 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Bahudhara

[edit]

Sorry, you or someone else called me a Pest here>> "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Bahudhara#FYI".

You think that is okay huh? 129.127.32.138 (talk) 07:07, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Slow down, please

[edit]

You have been given a welcome panel with links to read, several polite requests, and warnings about the type of editing you are doing, but you seem to be carrying on regardless, without showing evidence of having read The Five Pillars or the Tutorial. Would you please slow down, read through the pages relating to the links on the Welcome panel, and in particular take note of WP:ES and WP:RS. You have responsibilities to Wikipedia and to other editors - I can understand that you may be enthusiastic, and this is nothing personal, but it is about keeping Wikipedia as a good resource for others. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 10:09, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. I am enthusiastic and I like to learn. Thanks.129.127.32.138 (talk) 06:35, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I noticed that you recently removed content from Hong Kong International Airport without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Your change is not supported by the sources cited. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Hi again. So the first protests caused no disruptions?129.127.32.138 (talk) 07:12, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not make summary judgements based on what you think, especially when removing other editors' work. No, if you read the sources, you will see nothing about disruption by the first protests - only inconvenience to passengers. The second (latter, as per the sentence) caused flight disruptions, as per the sources. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:27, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
You say you are wanting to learn, but your recent changes are not showing evidence of this. If you look at this change you made (with no WP:EDIT SUMMARY, followed by my edit (with edit summary), you might begin to learn some of the standards expected of Wikipedia editors. Go back to the Welcome panel above, do some reading and go through the tutorial, before you do any more editing. Good editors here do not rush through articles dropping in as many pieces of info as quickly as possible into as many articles as possible. Each edit needs time and care to ensure that it is appropriate, clearly expressed, properly sourced and explained in the edit summary. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:40, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Similar to above, this edit - please see my clean-up, and see also WP:MOS. I'm afraid that I don't have the time and patience to re-format and improve all of your sub-standard edits, but I will review and revert those that are not up to standard from now on. And if you carry on regardless, you will be sanctioned after a warning. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:00, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, I'm Laterthanyouthink. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to History of British Airways have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Unexplained edit, incorrectly changes date of photo. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 07:43, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hong Kong/China

[edit]

Hong Kong may be governed separately, but it is still physically and legally a part of China. Do not remove images/content from articles without discussing it on their respective talk pages first. Read WP:BRD. If you disagree, you can take it up with the administrators. MartinezMD (talk) 07:44, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No, it maybe physically a part of China. But legally, they have their own laws, own money, own immigration, etc. Dont you know? You are the one with the problem you take it to talk. 129.127.32.138 (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Singapore passport, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 08:11, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Personnel Selection Branch, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 05:29, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Did you even read that content??? That paragraph was a story, it doesnt even belong on that page.129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:30, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry! I guess I can edit too fast. I noticed now. --LPS and MLP Fan (Littlest Pet Shop) (My Little Pony) 05:32, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
No problem. Please disregard the message on your wall.129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:33, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Report

[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:45, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Why did Wikipedia do this and what is the outcome?129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:47, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please source and check info and citations before adding

[edit]

Again, I ask you to read some of the material linked to on the Welcome panel above, In particular, read why bare URLs are not a good idea. Also ensure that the article which you add as a source is relevant to the topic. The one you added to White Australia policy was about something else, and I had to re-edit so that the content matched the sources. If you do not take care, you are not only causing work for other editors, but providing poor information to readers. Believe me, I take no pleasure in following up your edits and posting reminders and comments on this page, but your continued repeating of what you have done before suggests that you are not in good faith trying to improve your skills. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:33, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Then don't. People can read, they dont need you to to do the edits. Besides, there are countless 'bare URLs' on wikipedia, why do you pick on me? The content on White Australia policy matches the source too. Happy new year btw.129.127.32.138 (talk) 05:35, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
It didn't match until I updated the article, after another editor had upgraded your citation to remove the bare URL. So that edit of yours wasted two people's time. I am not "picking on" you - but I am alerted to pages in my watch list, and because of your previous record and, being a conscientious editor myself, I randomly check some of your other contributions, that is all. When you are showing some willingness to listen, slow down, make sure you don't publish when you've broken formatting, etc. then you won't hear another peep out of me, I can assure you. If you cared about the quality of Wikipedia, you would not push back at suggestions not to use bare URLs. Even if you don't use a citation template, at a bare minimum you could show the title; but the date, source and access-date are important information to readers and other editors, for assessing the timeliness and veracity of the source. I would like to see you become a better editor so that your contributions are valuable. Happy new year! Laterthanyouthink (talk) 05:45, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Another example: you just decided to change the residency requirement for Australian citizenship in the Naturalization article from 4 years (correctly, as per source and main article) to 2 years (incorrect and unsourced). Can you see how you are damaging the credibility of Wikipedia by your actions? Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:06, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
But isnt it two years? You need to be in Australia as a Permanent Resident for two years. Unless it has changed? 129.127.32.138 (talk) 06:09, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it has changed, as per the 2007 Act mentioned in the main article about Australian citizenship, and the source given, after following a couple more links. My point is, don't add info off the top of your head, which you think is correct, without checking sources. It wouldn't have taken much to check this one. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

February 2020

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

El_C 08:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Why was I blocked?? I did the right thing by reverting one of the articles. And I only reverted it once. The other person did not explain anything and is at fault. 129.127.32.138 (talk) 08:14, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
You removed the {{Main|Cousin marriage in the Middle East}} template from the section. El_C 08:16, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Ooops! Sorry. I just went back to the article now and realized my mistake. Sorry about that. But I still think that two weeks is long. How about one week? 129.127.32.138 (talk) 08:19, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just unblocked you, instead. But please do not edit war. Rather, discuss your proposed changes on the article talk page and try to gain the consensus for them. Good luck. El_C 08:21, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you so much! This time I will also discuss on the Talk page.129.127.32.138 (talk) 01:56, 6 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Cousin marriage. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. PepperBeast (talk) 12:31, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:129.127.32.138&oldid=1054693950"