Jump to content

User talk:134.173.248.16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

November 2019

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Claremont McKenna College, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. You were already undone once. It seems well-sourced to me. Please discuss the material on the article's talk page rather than continuing to remove it, Meters (talk) 23:21, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
[edit]

Hi, I just removed a substantial quantity of material added in good faith to Medicine by someone at this IP address. The material added was far too detailed and lengthy for a subsection of a main article; Wikipedia requires a particular set of evidence-based standards for sources used in medical or related articles (see WP:MEDRS). Besides, there is already an artcle on Music Therapy, which is variously regarded worldwide as supplementary to medicine, alternative or allied to mainstream medicine. Sourcing for it can be difficult and challenging. Best wishes, Haploidavey (talk) 09:14, 14 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

November 2022

[edit]

Information icon Please do not remove information from an entry (in this case Concord Academy) without an explanation. It appears that you removed something from the entry for Concord Academy simply because it was unflattering. If you wish to contest well-sourced content, please discuss the material on the article's talk page rather than removing it to gain consensus. JByrne404 (talk) 15:15, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Connor Printz (September 14)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Spiderone was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, 134.173.248.16! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:27, 14 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

October 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Dirkbb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 2021 Microsoft Exchange Server data breach have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Dirkbb (talk) 23:01, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2023

[edit]

Information icon Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Isaidnoway (talk) 🍁 18:40, 8 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Concern regarding Draft:Connor Printz

[edit]

Information icon Hello, 134.173.248.16. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Connor Printz, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:06, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Connor Printz

[edit]

Hello, 134.173.248.16. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Connor Printz".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:27, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]