User talk:157.203.255.3

June 2014

Hello, I'm Widr. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Pease pudding because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Widr (talk) 07:43, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

January 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Leek, Staffordshire, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 14:39, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edits to British Rail Class 52

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, British Rail Class 52, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 11:42, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dixon's Chimney and Shaddon Mill, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tentinator 08:48, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Recent edit to Greengates

Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Greengates article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Bfpage |leave a message 13:01, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Loudoun Academy, Galston

Welcome, and thank you for your attempt to lighten up Wikipedia. However, this is an encyclopedia and the articles are intended to be serious, so please don't make joke edits as you did to Loudoun Academy, Galston. Readers looking for accurate information will not find them amusing. If you'd like to experiment with editing, try the sandbox, where you are given a good deal of freedom in what you write. Thank you! JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 14:46, 27 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

July 2015

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sheffield Wednesday F.C. because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 12:49, 29 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2015

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Mark Knopfler. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Binksternet (talk) 14:47, 27 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting content without any good reason...

Hello 157.203.255.3 (http://whatismyipaddress.com/ip/157.203.255.3) please DO NOT remove content that is true like the Rittal Clip&Go part number 2090.000

And if you do edit, please have the balls to use your own name instead of a companies IP address from London area....

If you do not like it that people have good ideas and that they are proud with that, fine, but go jogging outside and leave the text for what it is on Wikipedia!

Thank you very much. — Preceding unsigned comment added by K.Terwijn (talk • contribs) 21:10, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ed Fortune

Would you be kind enough to offer a reason as to why you proposed Ed Fortune be deleted?

AryaTargaryen (talk) 15:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)Arya Targaryen[reply]

December 2018

Hello, I'm Rrburke. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Odsonne Édouard— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. -- Rrburke (talk) 12:21, 20 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Tim Harris (footballer), without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 15:34, 19 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2019

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Planck time have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 13:20, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Planck time. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 13:21, 21 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Gary Sykes

You may want to fill out the record table you’re creating in the sandbox then copy and paste it into the article itself. It would make it easier and prevent any mistakes in the article. — ².O.^Boxing 21:00, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Darren-M. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to World on Fire (TV series) seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Darren-M talk 12:35, 15 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

World on Fire TV series

I saw that your edit from last month on the World on Fire (TV series) page was reverted by User:MapReader. That user has also been reverting my edits on the same page. I have put your link from the Telegraph back in. I have also raised a three-revert dispute with Wikipedia about MapReader’s conduct. If you would like to add to this by making a similar complaint about MapReader then please do so. You can talk about this on my talk page if you wish. 16:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Additional, the edit war dispute I have raised can be found here. reinthal (talk) 17:40, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Cedric Itten—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

March 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Swaffham—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 16:03, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

July 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I noticed that you made a change to an article, The Easterling, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:49, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.