Jump to content

User talk:17 cherry tree lane

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


)

17 cherry tree lane, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi 17 cherry tree lane! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:17, 15 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Leanne Battersby because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! 5 albert square (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Whitney Dean. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Whitney and Lee have not married, therefore he is not her husband 5 albert square (talk) 00:28, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning icon Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Sally Webster, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not add things that happen next year. If Sally changes her job next year, the article should be altered once it has happened. 5 albert square (talk) 20:45, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi
Could you please stop adding character breaks that are under one calendar year? To prevent infoboxes from becoming too crowded, we don't count these. Any questions, please feel free to ask me on my talk page. Thanks--5 albert square (talk) 21:11, 22 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have reverted your edit to Mick Carter. As per one of the episodes broadcast in July, he has never married Linda. Please do not add Linda as his wife again, or Mick as Linda's husband, unless they actually do marry. Thanks--5 albert square (talk) 20:31, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Janet Mitchell. I've already told you above that we do not count character breaks that are under 12 months. From what I can recall these 'breaks' for Janet were under 12 months. She is a recurring character so she can go many months without an appearance. This is as per consensus at WP:EE, editing against consensus is not allowed at Wikipedia and may lead to you being blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 21:05, 23 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Reference Errors on 23 November

[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:41, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  5 albert square (talk) 01:02, 24 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cain Dingle
added a link pointing to B&B
Kevin Webster
added a link pointing to Alison Webster

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 25 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

I have undone your edit to Lucy Beale. The reason being is that Jane would not stop being her mother just because she separated from Ian. Please stop adding that Jane stopped being her mother in 2011. Thanks!--5 albert square (talk) 01:55, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm 5 albert square. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Peter Barlow (Coronation Street) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. As per discussion at [[1]] breaks under one year are not counted. You have already been advised of this. 5 albert square (talk) 17:41, 29 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop icon You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Lola Pearce. Rain the 1 00:29, 30 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

December 2014

[edit]
Stop icon with clock
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent disruptive editing, as you did at Peter Barlow (Coronation Street). Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  5 albert square (talk) 21:35, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Please note that I have also undone your edit to Carly Wicks. Unless the character has been played by more than one actor or actress, there is no need to put years next to the actor or actress name. Carly's article quite clearly states that Michaela Stephen only appeared as a young Carly, so in a flashback etc. If I remember correctly, she only appeared for a few minutes if that. Therefore there is no reason to put years next to the actress' name.
When you return from your block, please do not edit against consensus as you have been doing. I suggest that you use this time out to read WP:CONSENSUS. --5 albert square (talk) 21:54, 1 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

--5 albert square (talk) 00:52, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Peter and Carla Barlow

[edit]

STOP putting 2014 down as the end of Peter and Carla's marriage. All we know is that she changed her name back to Connor and that no divorce papers have been filed. 96.238.63.200 (talk) 21:26, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]