User talk:192.241.63.81

April 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Smarties (tablet candy) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Smarties (tablet candy) was changed by 192.241.63.81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.897688 on 2016-04-23T02:58:23+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:58, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 04:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

March 2018

Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Judy Garland, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 07:11, 9 March 2018 (UTC)

October 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Psychopathy has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Psychopathy was changed by 192.241.63.81 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.87426 on 2018-10-06T01:15:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:15, 6 October 2018 (UTC)

October 2019

Hello, I'm Hurricane111. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Creative class have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Hurricane111 (talk) 01:44, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Donald Trump photo op at St. John's Church. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Adakiko (talk) 05:57, 21 March 2022 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm Arado Ar 196. I noticed that you recently removed content from Carl Weiss without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. a!rado (C✙T) 17:16, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

I removed those two citations because neither supports the theory that Carl Weiss did not shoot Huey Long. The Williams quote is especially egregious, and if you bothered to read that chapter you would know that. He specifically says that the myth (meaning the idea that Weiss is not the killer) is wrong, unless all the witnesses lied to cover something up. You can't get more obvious than that. He also mocks the idea throughout the chapter, pointing out that the people who support that theory simultaneously claim that Weiss' gun jammed, and that there was no gun.

Likewise, the author of the blog post (which should not have been cited anyways, because, so far as I can tell, he has no qualifications of any kind) is no longer of the opinion that Weiss is not the killer. If you click on the link, you'll see that he says that it can now be proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Weiss killed Long.

Neither of these paragraphs should be included in this article. 192.241.63.81 (talk) 20:48, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---