User talk:199.7.157.36

Recent edit to Manuel Ferrara

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Manuel Ferrara), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- Michael Scott Cuthbert (talk) 18:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Seth Griffith has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Seth Griffith was changed by 199.7.157.36 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.855362 on 2016-10-11T17:20:33+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:20, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Purple Osaka mustard has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Purple Osaka mustard was changed by 199.7.157.36 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.984239 on 2018-12-12T22:40:00+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:40, 12 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

199.7.157.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

1 year is an excessive length for a block of an entire mobile phone network

Decline reason:

This is a statement of opinion, not an unblock request. As long as the range is being used for extensive socking then the block should remain. Logged-in editors are not affected by the block. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 15:50, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

199.7.157.36 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

the fact is thousands of people, myself included, are being needlessly inconvenienced while a sockpuppeteer could easily create sockpuppets elsewhere and still use them with this network so not only is a year long block inconveniencing many people, it serves no purpose as someone who wants to sockpuppet can easily do so.

Decline reason:

Affected users can request an account via WP:ACC if they wish to edit constructively. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:41, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

September 2021

Hello, I'm ArglebargleIV. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Dennis Prager—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ArglebargleIV (talk) 11:13, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.