User talk:199.79.170.212

February 2009

You have been blocked from editing for a short time in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. Please be more careful to discuss controversial changes or seek dispute resolution rather than engaging in an edit war. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Deacon of Pndapetzim (Talk) 03:30, 13 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Surf City, North Carolina has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:43, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

October 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Chelsea Clinton, you will be blocked from editing. Tvoz/talk 07:26, 9 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Ray Comfort has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Marek.69 ^talk 01:03, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to List of Scientologists. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 22:57, 20 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below; but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 23:51, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Jerry Sherlock has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:27, 21 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

September 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page The Purchase Independent has been reverted.
Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.facebook.com/pages/The-Purchase-Independent/127046502521?ref=ts.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 03:46, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Pedophile’s Guide to Love and Pleasure has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. QU ^TalkQu 21:49, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Hello, I'm NickW557. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Stained glass— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 23:27, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

damn man they should make you president of wikipedia.

i saw your edits on the Fallon Fox and damn did you lay some truth bombs. Its too bad wikipedia has been co-oped by delusional retards. Wikipedia has decide to throw evidence and reality into the garbage when it comes to trangenderism. They will willfully ignore DNA evidence for the sake of their liberal agenda. It makes me sick witnessing that the feelings of insane gender benders are catered to. Logic and evidence are the only thing that should matter not people's stupid feelings.

I also want to share a counter argument with you in case you run into more retards and need some extra ammo. When ever you hear a stupid lib say "Well you see there's sex and then there's gender..." just reply with "Well you see there are automobiles and then there are cars. Cars is what ever I identify it as, so therefore I drive a unicorn and should be exempt from paying taxes on my car."

March 2018

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Juan DeBiedma. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. General Ization ^Talk 00:07, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.