User talk:203.221.17.174

This is 203.221.17.174's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Manning Wardle L Class has been accepted

Manning Wardle L Class, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 21:30, 20 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout has been accepted

LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Fermiboson (talk) 11:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/LNER Class A3 2506 Salmon Trout until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Trainsandotherthings (talk) 16:29, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LNER 4-8-2 "Mountain" locomotives has been accepted

LNER 4-8-2 "Mountain" locomotives, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:58, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Furness Railway K4 Class has been accepted

Furness Railway K4 Class, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Theroadislong (talk) 16:59, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Block evasion

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ponyo^{bons mots} 17:17, 21 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to request that after my block expires or I get unblocked that all the articles that I created which got deleted are to be undeleted. 203.221.17.174 (talk) 02:03, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been banned and your articles are not going to be restored. Any further attempts to evade your block will meet the same consequences. You must address the reasons for your block and convince the community that you should be unbanned. Trainsandotherthings (talk) 18:45, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be waiting until my one week ban has expired because one week is considered to me as fair enough 203.221.17.174 (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Addressing my reason to an apology: I got so obsessed with making the articles via AfC from the first moment when I started getting obsessed with making the articles via AfC. And it was my pride, that blinded me. I loved making the articles via AfC too much to see what I was becoming, What I, was turning myself into. I'm. I'm sorry. 203.221.17.174 (talk) 00:39, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Also, question: How am I going to convince the community if I am blocked? It sounds to me it makes no sense. 203.221.17.174 (talk) 00:41, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Reconciliating to the community of Wikipedia via unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

203.221.17.174 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

@Trainsdootherthings and his crew win this conflict. I cannot fight anymore. Here's what I am going to say to end this conflict so we're all at peace:
I got so obsessed with making the articles via AfC from the first moment when I started getting obsessed with making the articles via AfC. And it was my pride, that blinded me. I loved making the articles via AfC too much to see what I was becoming, What I, was turning myself into. I'm. I'm sorry.

(Even if this does get declined, I am too weak to fight it all because of all of the things that hurt me like calling me a "sock" and many other things have beaten me down to my knees.)

Decline reason:

Apologizing is a good place to start; however, as the ban was imposed as the result of a community discussion, there will need to be a new community discussion to remove it, as no administrator can unilaterally lift it. If you wish to pursue being unbanned, you will need to write a statement discussing your inappropriate behavior and telling what will be different going forward. I would suggest that you take all the time you need to compose such a statement, as the community is highly unlikely to agree to unblock you until you go six months without attempting to edit as a show of good faith and a demonstration that you can abide by policies and community decisions. 331dot (talk) 09:05, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

How exactly do I do that (to pursue to be being unbanned)?. Also on the article Southern Pacific Class T-1, there's a typo error on the infobox. where it says "180 psi", it shows that as the boiler diameter when in reality its meant to be on the boiler pressure. Can you fix that while replying to this comment if its possible? 203.221.17.174 (talk) 10:12, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

also the links that you leave on the "See https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&oldid=1188039336#Australian_railroad_IP" are mostly links to an old revision of the issue. I was able to find an archived version of the issue here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/IncidentArchive1143#Australian_railroad_IP 203.221.17.174 (talk) 10:18, 26 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. — 🎄🎆 Paper9oll 🎆🎄 (🔔 • 📝) 08:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for block evasion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:27, 29 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.