User talk:23.130.48.1

March 2020

Hello, I'm Ifnord. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Natalie Wood have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. Ifnord (talk) 22:23, 15 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adpositional phrase. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 01:57, 17 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Battle of the Bulge, you may be blocked from editing. Woerich (talk) 23:37, 28 March 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2020

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Contradiction. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. SemiHypercube 19:07, 8 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Trial of Michael Jackson—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 00:24, 13 May 2020 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Space exploration, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Altamel (talk) 18:28, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Ok, your edit intrigued me, so I did some more digging. The Pascal-B nuclear test is thought to have accelerated a steel cap to escape velocity, so theoretically the object could have been launched into space. But even if that is so, your edit was still unnecessary for a number of reasons: (1) there was no reason to remove the rest of the article's content, (2) scientists disagree whether the cap would have been vaporized by its high velocity before reaching space, and (3) the article explains that some military rockets reached suborbital space before Sputnik, so nowhere does the article claim that Sputnik was the first man-made object in space. Instead, Sputnik was the first satellite to orbit Earth. Nonetheless, I found your factoid interesting. Best, Altamel (talk) 18:42, 15 May 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Eighth note—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 17:39, 4 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Princess Wencheng. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Jv0314 (talk | contribs) 18:47, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Independent voter has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Independent voter was changed by 23.130.48.1 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.969397 on 2020-10-06T17:45:18+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:45, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from attempting to make unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been disallowed by an edit filter. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 09:05, 12 October 2020 (UTC)

---