User talk:545lljkr

Progymnospermophyta

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Progymnospermophyta, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://comenius.susqu.edu/bi/202/Plants/Vascular%20Cryptogams/progymnospermophyta.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:38, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Primate fossil age and era changes

Hi 545lljkr, I have noticed that you have repeatedly made the same few changes to Primate regarding fossil age and era. Your changes were not discussed and have been reverted three times now. Please seek consensus before making changes like this again. I have created a section where we can discuss your opinion at Talk:Primate#Regarding fossil age and era. I hope you will present your reasons for this change and we can make the correction if warranted. Thank you. Chaldor (talk) 20:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 00:25, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Images

You asked about using images on Wikipedia. The details are at WP:Images, but here's a brief summary. To place an image in an article, use the following code:

[[Image:imagename.jpg|thumb|right|some text to appear beneath the image]]

Change the 'right' to 'left' if you want the image to appear on the left side of the page, instead of on the right.

To upload an image to wikipedia in the first place, then you need to use this page: special:upload, or, if the image is free, this one: commons:special:upload Anaxial (talk) 21:23, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I should have added: do remember to specify where you obtained the image, so that we can check it is not copyright. (There are guidelines on this at WP:Images). See the following notice for further detail:

Image source problem with Image:Page11 5.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Page11 5.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Anaxial (talk) 18:00, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Trechnotheria

A tag has been placed on Trechnotheria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A2 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a foreign language article that was copied and pasted from another Wikimedia project, or was transwikied out to another project. Please see Wikipedia:Translation to learn about requests for, and coordination of, translations from foreign-language Wikipedias into English.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. PoinDexta1 | Talk to Me | 02:25, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A2 tag removed. The article is obviously in English. --Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:46, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am having problems with TW. Apologies for the mis-tagging. PoinDexta1 | Talk to Me | 07:51, 27 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orthrozanclus

Why did youchange the fossil range for Orthrozanclus? -- Philcha (talk) 07:01, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which document? The "Fossil range" box is used to give a time, e.g. in Dinosaur it says "235–65 Ma". -- Philcha (talk) 20:29, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense of Sparassodont (disambiguation)

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Sparassodont (disambiguation), by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Sparassodont (disambiguation) provides no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Sparassodont (disambiguation), please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 17:21, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:100 1878.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:100 1878.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source/license for Image:100-1869.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:100-1869.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 21:48, 13 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Shuotheriidae

Category?? Blofeld of SPECTRE (talk) 13:49, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Andreolepis hedei has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Wysprgr2005 (talk) 00:17, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Alisphenoid

A tag has been placed on Alisphenoid, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Megaman en m (talk) 15:20, 15 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nazis were Socialist

"The Nazis were far from socialist, they were funded by big businesses as well as the church. They protected land-owning elites and despised the labor movement. 545lljkr (talk) 22:13, 16 December 2008 (UTC)"

And they called their movement National Socialism because...? The argument in question was weather Nazis should be considered "far-right". I asserted that they shouldn't because they advocated statism, greater government control, nationalizing industries, and other minor ideologies traditionally considered leftist in order to show that they have no place being considered "far right". I was not necessarily trying to contend that they were equal to Lenin, Marx or Stalin in their leftward ideology. In fact, there were, at the time, many admitted socialists against Stalin's brand of socialism. My only aim was to show that they were not in the slightest rightward leaning in either economic or personal and therefore should not be considered "far-right".

You can view it straight from Hitler's mouth here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazi#Anti-capitalist_rhetoric

Good luck.

Ryratt (talk) 06:09, 22 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Crista interfenestralis

A tag has been placed on Crista interfenestralis requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guidelines for people and for organizations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Habbouser (talk) 21:58, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:100_1887.JPG

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:100_1887.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris 05:15, 27 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about my talk page.

You commented on my talk page. Why? First, this is an IP address I recently received. (IP Addresses are not static.) Second, the last time anyone used this IP Address was February 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.208.72 (talk) 04:40, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Additional question: You say that Christian churches were unified into the Reich Church in Nazi Germany. Isn't that like religious freedom in countries where Christians are persecuted, i.e., Communist China? You need to be part of a state-sanctioned church or you will need to go underground? And I'm wondering, do conservatives really believe in government as teacher of morality? I thought that conservatives see morality as coming from religion. Also, the Nazis banned guns and home-schooling, which modern conservatives are more likely to support than liberals. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.234.208.72 (talk) 04:44, 11 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:PIC-0104.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:PIC-0104.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 03:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]