User talk:78.68.210.173

I detest opaqueness masquerading as civility. Frankness will get you the furthest with me.

Welcome!

Interested in becoming a regular contributor to Wikipedia? Create an account!

Your host, h173n19-rny-a13.ias.bredband.telia.com (78.68.210.173), is registered to TeliaSonera, an Internet service provider through which multiple users may connect to the Internet via proxy, so you may receive messages on this page that were not intended for you.

To have your own user pages, keep track of articles you've edited in a watchlist, and have access to a few other special features, please consider registering an account! It's fast and free.

Review contributions carefully if blocking this IP address or reverting its contributions. If a block is needed, administrators should consider a soft block using Template:Anonblock.

If you are autoblocked repeatedly, contact your Internet service provider or network administrator and request it contact Wikimedia's XFF project about enabling X-Forwarded-For HTTP headers on its proxy servers so that blocks will affect only the intended user. In response to vandalism from this IP address, abuse reports may be sent to its network administrator for investigation.

Network administrators, to monitor this IP address for vandalism, can subscribe to a web feed of this page in either RSS or Atom format.

Dispute Resolution[edit]

Greetings, I have deleted your post at the Dispute Resolution Noticeboard. In order to open a case there, please click the button located under "Do you need assistance?" If you have a general question, you may ask it at WT:DRN. Cheers! DonIago (talk) 19:22, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oki fixed.

March 2015[edit]

Edit summaries such as "Dude, either you're a propagandist or I don't know what" are not appropriate. Please be more civil. The edit in question is: [1]. Thanks, JoeSperrazza (talk) 21:44, 12 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I n my opinion it's the honest truth of my feelings so it is appropriate 78.68.210.173 (talk) 19:38, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Take my advice or not, but doing it again makes it certain you'll be reported to WP:ANI and possible you'll be blocked. Its OK to think what you want, but expressing such feelings here is not OK. JoeSperrazza (talk) 20:05, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Are you bloody deleting conversations on my own talkpage? 78.68.210.173 (talk) 21:26, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re-adding the answer that was here before: I will not take your advice. I am currently the victim of far worse abuse at the hands of the user Iryna Harpy and you have little pitty for that it seems while me and Gloucester are not attacking each other and I was only presenting my opinion of him as I thought it and fully explained myself. I am in the process of writing a report about this user so feel free to write one about me too. 78.68.210.173 (talk) 20:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC)

Do not under any circumstances delete content on my own talk-page or it will be reported for abuse. Concerning my deletion of your template you are first to justify the need for it, see your PMs. 78.68.210.173 (talk) 21:28, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The template is a part of Wikipedia:Administration, and it is used to show that an IP may be used by multiple people. This affects the blocks done by admins (more), and therefore should not be removed. You have been shown WP:BLANKING & WP:DRC before, they exist for a reason. Also, it is by no means demanding that you create an account, it merely gives it as the alternative.

Consider this an official warning: Do not remove the shared IP notice from your talk page again. -- Orduin ^Discuss 22:03, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template removed per template rules quote: "This template should be used on IPs which appear to be or are likely to be shared by multiple users - typically IPs assigned to large institutions, or to a pool of dynamic IP addresses. Where there is no indication of this, the template should not be used. "78.68.210.173 (talk) 22:07, 13 March 2015 (UTC) I demand to hear what indication you may have that the IP is shared, since that would be of security interest to me as it should not be shared. 78.68.210.173 (talk) 22:08, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of Discretionary Sanctions on Eastern Europe[edit]

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

I suggest you particularly pay attention to the purposes of Wikipedia and the developing consensus in the discussion you began at RS/N. Rhoark (talk) 00:53, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, 78.68.210.173. You have new messages at Iryna Harpy's talk page.
Message added 03:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Iryna Harpy (talk) 03:50, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015[edit]

Hello, I'm Liz. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Iryna Harpy that didn't seem very civil, so it has been removed. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please do not use obscene language to another editor or resort to name calling ("fucking bitch"). Civility is expected of editors on Wikipedia no matter how heated the disagreements become. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:26, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Drmies (talk) 18:55, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Oh, I blocked you and only now I see the "fucking bitch" comment. Well well. IP, I don't know what you came here to do--well, I can guess--but it has by now devolved into trolling, personal attacks, forum shopping, and false allegations ("cabal"--if you only knew how ridiculous it is to put me in a cabal with RGloucester). In other words, there may have been something moderately legitimate below all this, but now it's just a timesink, that's all. Drmies (talk) 18:58, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, Drmies, I must be schizoid as I've established that I don't seem to be committed enough to the cabal I 'belong' to. Am I attached to the obvious 'pro-Western' cabal, or am I attached to the 'anti-Western' cabal? Considering the fact that I've 'collaborated' with editors such as Darouet, Al Khazar, Moscow Connection, Herzen, Ezhiki, SkoraPobeda, Leftcry and Jirka.h23 (+++), as well as having railed against the usual suspects constituting the inner sanctum purportedly POV-pushing Western press 'lies', I seem to be extremely confused as to whether I'm doing the right thing by 'colleagues'. Oh, well. It seems I need assistance with establishing which side I'm on. Do we have cabal meetings and support groups available? --Iryna Harpy (talk) 23:08, 14 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just a tip[edit]

If you don't like what someone has added to Wikipedia, don't talk try to convince them like you would a friend or a neighbour. This is an encyclopedia with a complex series of policies. Think of it like a court of law; cases are won not by being friendly and appealing to common sense, but by being thorough and doing your homework (the hard way). Nobody will help you or be on your side, unless you're quite lucky. Being neighbourly and casual doesn't actually help (nor the flip side of being nasty). Good luck. Esn (talk) 20:03, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2015[edit]

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on other people again, as you did at User talk:Drmies, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:39, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. — Malik Shabazz ^Talk/_Stalk 21:49, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.