User talk:86.5.102.9

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions to Professor Green and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Sahaib (talk) 20:07, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Freeze the fear was 2022

It was 2022

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freeze_the_Fear_with_Wim_Hof 86.5.102.9 (talk) 02:36, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Live scores

Please do not update match stats (whether a player’s or a club’s or a league table etc.) until the player’s involvement in the match has finished / the match itself has finished. That means (especially, for example, another goal is scored) that errors can be minimised. Many thanks. Giant Snowman 15:38, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Bruce George Peter Lee—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erm is it not constructive too state a fact ? Read the full article his name is now Peter Tredget he changed it legally so unblock me and put my changes back on 86.5.102.9 (talk) 09:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Notification: Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Materialscientist (talk) 09:47, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Erm no his name is Peter Tredget he changed it it says so in the page read the full article Peter Tredget is his name I have been blocked for updating a LEGAL FACT 86.5.102.9 (talk) 09:48, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.5.102.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

ive been blocked for doing a correct edit 86.5.102.9 (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request placed in a section header; edits should only be placed in the larger edit window, not the smaller section header/edit summary window. 331dot (talk) 10:07, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.5.102.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for doing a correct edit read the full page his name is Peter Tredget he changed his name legally therefore it is his name I would like too be unblocked and have my edit out back on as it is currently wrong and my edit is right 86.5.102.9 (talk) 09:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Please offer sources that show this- all information in articles about living people must be sourced, see WP:BLP. Also note that we don't necessarily use official or legal names, see WP:COMMONNAME. This doesn't mean legal names cannot be mentioned, but it must be done correctly. 331dot (talk) 10:09, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

IT SAYS SO IN THE VERY ARTICE I WAS EDITING

Here is proof !

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-humber-60304365.amp

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

86.5.102.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for putting a fact it is not vandalism not only is it listed in the very article his name was changed I can provide proof https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-humber-60304365.amp 86.5.102.9 (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Duplicate request again. You only need to place it once. 331dot (talk) 15:49, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

86.5.102.9 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for putting a fact it is not vandalism not only is it listed in the very article his name was changed I can provide proof https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-humber-60304365.amp 86.5.102.9 (talk) 10:30, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

Your original article edit was not vandalism, so it doesn't make sense to keep you blocked. Please see the warning below about incivility. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Well do your job and unblock me you doofus — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.5.102.9 (talk) 16:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you've been through a bit of a procedural nightmare. Your incivility above is understandable, but still not acceptable. Editors and admins, even when they're wrong, should not be insulted. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 21:59, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

February 2024

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for making personal attacks towards other editors.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Block extended due to personal attacks. 331dot (talk) 17:52, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

331dot, I really think we should unblock this user. I'm convinced that Materialscientist's original vandalism block was a mistake, and the personal attacks since then have been pretty mild. About as mild as I think is reasonable after being blocked for a good-faith edit. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 19:05, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure their attitude bodes well for the future- and I understand being annoyed at this situation but civility is still important- but I no longer think that should stand in the way of removing this. 331dot (talk) 20:12, 12 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.