User talk:97.104.210.47

Welcome![edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

Create new pages and rename pages
Edit semi-protected pages
Upload images
Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (97.104.210.47) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:49, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits[edit]

Hi. Please stop adding trivial sub-genre's to album/song page's, based on your own perspective. Wikipedia requires users to only use reliable sources, and does not permit original research. Thank you. --Blastmaster11 (talk) 23:34, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Niggaz4Life. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dr. K. 02:40, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Niggaz4Life. Dr. K. 02:45, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Nakon 03:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Help me![edit]

Hello 97.104.210.47. You used the {{Help me}} tag but did not ask a question. Please write out your question and replace the {{Help me}} tag when you are done, and someone will be along to help. Alternatively, you can ask your question at the Teahouse, the help desk, or join Wikipedia's Live Help IRC channel to get real-time assistance. Click here for instant access to the channel.

Please help me with...

97.104.210.47 (talk) 03:09, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

97.104.210.47 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please include the original unblock request.

Decline reason:

Declining. (non-admin closure) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

My account. I have done nothing wrong. My edits under route 97.104.210.47 have been socially approved by the majority of wikipedians -- more +s than anything else.. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Penicillin_on_Wax&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niggaz4Life&action=history https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Love_Child_(Sweet_Sensation_album)&action=history

I believe I've been wrongly blocked. No one has complained about my stuff, except for one mod.

97.104.210.47 (talk) 03:20, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

~~Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, you may be blocked from editing.~~ - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:37, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just saw the block. Please understand this is not about your intentions. Wikipedia has an ongoing problem with genre warring -- editors making large numbers of unsourced and undiscussed changes of and additions to genres in various articles based entirely on their opinions. In addition to violating our guiding principle that material must be verifiable, it turns articles into unstable battlegrounds as editors repeatedly and frequently add/subtract/change genres to their "correct" version against everyone else's "incorrect" versions.

After your block expires, please slow down and look for reliable sources discussing the genres that apply for various songs, albums and artists. Thanks. - SummerPhD^v2.0 03:48, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: fixed mismatched brackets. This way, 97.104.210.47 can read the wikilinked page. Rotideypoc41352 (talk) 03:57, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK then how come, most of my stuff was liked (hence all the pluses), and yet the mods, with all due respect, their removals of my stuff was thumbed down? No one was complaining about my edits or even made it an issue until that one person did that. I'm not getting this. I'm sorry

With all due respect, sir, no edit war was caused. There's only an edit war cause they're looking for one, with all due respect to them. No one complained about my edits, cause I have a whole bunch of pluses, except for those 2 or 3 people. Some of my edits got as much as 118+. So I'm sorry. But I don't get why I got this block. 97.104.210.47 (talk) 03:51, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Liked, thumbs up? Wikipedia has none of these features. Wikipedia content is not set by popularity. Wikipedia uses wp:reliable sources (please read! Thank you) Cheers

I mean the pluses and negatives that come up (that mean your stuff was liked or disliked), next to the edits Like this for example: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Niggaz4Life&action=history Jim1138 (talk) 04:05, 7 May 2016 (UTC) (look at the revision edits -- and next to it you'll see pluses and negatives next to numbers -- pluses meaning your stuff was liked, negative meaning it was disliked) That's why I don't understand this ban. No one complained about them.[reply]

(Stalking) I think you mean the 'bytes' that the page has. This has nothing to do with likes/dislikes. This merely describes how big or small the page is. The numbers that you are referencing are how big or small of a change that you have made to an article with any given edit. 2601:1C0:4901:2191:E5A8:C404:EA64:C7EF (talk) 04:11, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The point here is that in order to maintain some sense of stability in the project and build a meaningful collection of reliably sourced information (as opposed to a random collection of opinions) we have (in descending order) core policies, policies, guidelines and essays intended to unify the project and limit chaos.

The edits we're discussing here are an extensive string of rapid-fire additions of opinions with (in many cases) "difficult" edit summaries. If we took the "hands off" that you seem to be advocating for your edits, we would have to take a similar approach to others' edits in response. Your edit summaries make it clear you feel strongly about many of these. Other editors with different opinions feel equally strongly.

I'm also seeing a battleground approach on your part "Make me stop doing; I'm doing it by definition, pal. You don't like it? TOO BAD."[1] Well, yes, you've been stopped. IMO, you're going to have to sit this one out. (Not that it's my call.) - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:21, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

May 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at 100 Miles and Runnin'. Please discuss genres on the articles' talk pages and establish a consensus BEFORE making changes. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

OK, with all due respect, this is stupid. How the heck are my edits not right. How is Ice-T not East Coast rap for instance, considering "New Jack Hustler" and many of this songs with Donald D are East Coast rap songs. And many of the songs on NWA's albums are comedy songs

And considering that Tim Dog does rap the criminal life he is gangsta rap too.

97.104.210.47 (talk) 03:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to either cite independent reliable sources for your changes or discuss the issue on the article talk pages to establish a consensus for each change. - SummerPhD^v2.0 04:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for genre warring. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 04:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Excuse me, you said you'd only block me without warning if I did it again -- I didn't do it again, after this warning, so why am I blocked?

Final warning @ 23:15, 11 May 2016;

Unsourced, undiscussed genre changes on 23 articles in the 30 minutes after that. - SummerPhD^v2.0 11:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well excuse me, but I didn't get a warning on the messages thing, so I wasn't to look at this. I only look at this if I get a warning first on the message board. You should have sent me one.

The "warning on the messages thing" ("You have new messages") is automatically generated when anyone other than you edits your talk page. Additionally, you should see an indicator when anyone reverts an edit you made, as happened repeatedly during your flurry of edits. Also, if you are about to make a change to an article and think you have made the same change earlier, it is worth checking the page's history to see why it was reverted; many of the edits I reverted were changes you had been warned about previously. Finally, as virtually all of your edits leading up to both blocks were unsourced/undiscussed changes to genres, you will want to review WP:GWAR during your block to avoid the same problems in the future. If there is anything you aren't sure you understand or would like some help with, just ask. In the end, you'll find that most of us are here to help the project in whatever ways we can. - SummerPhD^v2.0 21:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Apache Ain't Shit, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Rob van vee 11:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genres in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at New Jack Hustler (Nino's Theme). Rob van vee 11:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 12:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address.