User talk:AJcrowley666

June 2020

Hello, I'm S.Hinakawa. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Tom Ellis (actor), but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! -- S.Hinakawa (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Tom Ellis (actor), but we are trying to write an encyclopedia here, so please keep your edits factual and neutral. Our readers are looking for serious articles and will not find joke edits amusing. Remember that Wikipedia is a widely used reference tool, so we have to take what we do here seriously. If you'd like to experiment with editing, use the sandbox instead. Thank you. DanielRigal (talk) 12:34, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please pardon me for being frank, but I believe the vast majority of the people clicking on Tom Ellis' Wikipedia page are far more interested in obtaining genuine information, then becoming richer by utterly boring biological facts. If I were famous, I definitely wouldn't want people to read about my life as if that of the first president of the US. Luckily I'm retired so I won't inconvenience you. You may cross out the 'bravely', you humans might regard that as emotional. Also, if Wikipedia were a serious site only edited by professional intellectuals, please tell me how exactly is it relevant information that Joe Gilgun lives in the middle of a forest? Other than, of course, asking for autographs. AJcrowley666 (talk) 15:01, 21 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AJcrowley666, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi AJcrowley666! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Keelan (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Rosbif73. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Elon Musk have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Rosbif73 (talk) 16:24, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike overly serious people, I think it would be useful if people got a precise image of what or who ever's article they were reading on Wikipedia, instead of having to read a ridiculously long text full of facts and mostly lacking interesting contributions. I don't quite see the problem with the edits I made, knowing that I linked a source and my contributions always had to do with the main topic of the article. I would very much refuse to live in a world where all we know is dates and titles, instead of gaining new, useful information via encyclopedies. I know from experience that you will not honor me with an answer, most likely thinking me an ironically ‘edgy’ teenager, when I only want to make the articles better and perhaps be able to share what I know, living in a world of so-called freedom of speech. I do hope I made my opinion clear. Ciao. AJcrowley666 (talk) 17:38, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]