User talk:A flumine usque ad mare

Welcome!

Hi A flumine usque ad mare! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Kleuske (talk) 18:44, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your username

I see you are hard at work to get autoconfirmed status, but your username, though translated into latin, isn't uncontroversial after the October 7 massacre. I strongly suggest you change it to something less offensive, since this username practically guarantees disruption. Kleuske (talk) 18:48, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Palestine problem was neither started by Palestinians nor did it started on October 7. What happened that day, on the other hand, was not a massacre, but an act of resistance against an unjustified invasion brought forth upon with disgusting efforts to annihilate the Palestinian people that has continued uninterruptedly for 75 years. Even if you do accept the allegations that Hamas ever targeted civilian women and children, the claimed amount of civilian casualties is no where even near to the death toll of those who were martyred by the apartheid zionist regime. So please, take off your blinders, don't you be chanting what those bloodsucking oppressors want you to believe and repeat. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 19:32, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Between the comment above and the blatant WP:GAMING, I'm blocking. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:35, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A flumine usque ad mare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You can clearly see by checking my contributions that I was trying to improve some pages, prior to this woman had randomly started talking trash about my username. What did you expect me to do, say "okay ma'am" and move on? I do constructive edits, but genuinely, it has nothing to do with the fact that I can't stand innocent babies getting murdered just for their birthplace and religious affiliation of their parents either. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 19:47, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Clear WP:BATTLEGROUND problems. Yamla (talk) 20:19, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A flumine usque ad mare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

You are the ones who banned me for I did not satisfy your ideological mindset. I chose my name the way that I felt, but I didn't want any of this to have anything to do with what I do here. Again I insist you to check my contributions and see that I was trying to be constructive before my username was targeted. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 20:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Please read WP:NOTTHEM in particular. Aoidh (talk) 01:43, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A flumine usque ad mare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Me make no bad edit, me try make good edit. Random woman say my username bad, me respond. You undo block, me simply try make good edit again. You believe I no make, see my contribution. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 03:49, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are very close to having talk page access pulled. 331dot (talk) 08:51, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

A flumine usque ad mare (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The block is not necessary to prevent me from damaging or disrupting Wikipedia because I was trying to make constructive edits. Even if you think the block was necessary, it isn't anymore, because I understand that I was blocked for the fact that my username was perceived offensive but I insisted on keeping it. However I am now willing to collaborate and to change my username. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 09:35, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

The socking is disqualifying. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 14:56, 12 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Tell us what you want to change it to. 331dot (talk) 09:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I want it to be User:The River maybe. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 09:41, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Already exists, and there's no way we will rename you to anything having to do with the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. 331dot (talk) 09:46, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then, what about "User:The Watermelon Slice" ? A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 09:59, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yay! Also, please address this edit. You may think it's funny, but it's not. Just FYI, I am a woman and I consider it a personal attack. Kleuske (talk) 12:48, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Simply didn't knew. Changing it. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 14:08, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

And you imagine that suffices? Kleuske (talk) 14:14, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm thinking of keeping everything that was written here. A flumine usque ad mare (talk) 14:23, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This has gone on too long. Talk page access pulled. You are not welcome here. 331dot (talk) 16:32, 10 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]