Jump to content

User talk:Aaru3h

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello, Aaru3h, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! KylieTastic (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Simon Peters Draft (January 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Aaru3h! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 13:29, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic Hello Kylie all the information that was given in this article was provided by the Fiji Football association, Simon Peters Wife, Simons Best friend and other reporters in Fiji at that time if this could be re looked at this would be much appreciated as I spent a lot of time and effort into every piece of information on this article to make sure it is correct
Thank you for your time Aaru3h (talk) 13:34, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aaru3h, Wikipedia is an encyclopedia not a place for subjects to write about themselves or subjects they know - see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. All new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). It has no sources and is not neutral (see WP:NPOV). Regards KylieTastic (talk) 14:23, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic Hi Kylie
I do not know Simon Peters or any of the people I used to get the information personally, I only reached out to them cause I heard of the name Simon Peters and thought he could be maybe someone I could right about, and therefore reached out to my sources I know none of them personally. it would be really appreciated if you can take a second look at this article Aaru3h (talk) 14:28, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Aaru3h, if its not a Wikipedia:Conflict of interest then it sounds like it hits the policy Wikipedia:No original research. As stated above all new articles on Wikipedia have to show the subject is notable (See WP:N) which in most cases requires significant coverage (WP:SIGCOV) in multiple independent (WP:INDY) reliable sources (WP:RS). Also all content must be sourced for Wikipedia:Verifiability and it is completely unsourced. KylieTastic (talk) 15:31, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic if by notable you mean well known, then yes you could go to any person in Fiji and I assure you they'll know who Simon Peters is, There are many books about the legend in the Nadi and Suva library, and people are still writing articles about him and his legacy in Fiji in the newspapers etc Aaru3h (talk) 23:52, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aaru3h, people reading an encyclopedia cannot go to Fiji and talk to people also Wikipedia does not care about the opinions of individuals and as now state twice the usually "requires significant coverage in multiple independent reliable sources". However books and newspapers are generally reliable sources, so if what you say is true the sources probably exist to write a article. It looks like some sources exist on the web [1], [2], [3] but need a few more for notability. KylieTastic (talk) 09:40, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
@KylieTastic so what, I need more articles and story's to back this up? what if I was to get a written statement from the CEO of Fiji Football association (Mohammed Yusuf) will that be enough notable sources or will I need to contact other news platforms? Aaru3h (talk) 11:34, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Aaru3h, any article is written based on actual references, so yes if you re-write the content/claims need to have sources back up the content. Sorry, but no, personal statements are not valid sources. If a subject was important in the history of an organisation normally they would have it in a history section of their website. So although personal statements are not valid, if as CEO they wanted to task the correct person/department to add such a section to the Fiji Football association website that would be one source that could be used as a reference for claims. At the moment he is just a mentioned with no depth on this and this. Note that for notability, most editors would probably not consider the association independent, but I'm sure there exist three independent sources for that purpose. Regards KylieTastic (talk) 12:43, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Simon Peters Draft[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Simon Peters Draft, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. GPL93 (talk) 21:48, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Aaru3h&oldid=1132762160"