User talk:Abhilashkrishn

Welcome!

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Abhilashkrishn! Thank you for your contributions. I am Skamecrazy123 and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Skamecrazy123 (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Skamecrazy123 (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Skamecrazy123 (talk) 11:54, 24 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Hi Abhilashkrishn, I'm just updating the clubs so I can put on more information on their pages soon. Don't worry, I'm just helping Wikipedia with more information. The main source I use is Soccerway, it has all the information needed.

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Skamecrazy123 (talk) 12:04, 24 May 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).[reply]

Speedy deletion of redirect?

Weigelia florida pink princess - out of interest, why are you bothering to A3-speedy a redirect? Eustachiusz (talk) 14:37, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Eustachiusz:When I was reviewing the article, the article doesn't have any content. After I nominated it for speedy delete, it seems to be someone created/redirected the page. Sorry for the inconvenience.

OK, thanks - no problem!Eustachiusz (talk) 14:47, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hooray! You created your Teahouse profile!

	Welcome to the Teahouse Badge
	Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. Earn more badges at: Teahouse Badges
Thank you for introducing yourself and contributing to Wikipedia! If you have any questions feel free to drop me a line at my talk page. Happy Editing! ~ Anastasia (talk) 14:59, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. You have new messages at Missionedit's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

~ Anastasia (talk) 20:14, 24 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

This is a new cloud computing technology, we are developing, no commercial activity involved please accept the same

i have changed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insubbu (talk • contribs) 06:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Insubbu:, as per WP:NOR; original research articles cannot be added to wikipedia. Wikipedia can be used to create an article that can be referenced from outside. - Abhilashkrishn (talk) 06:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

This is a new cloud computing technology, we are developing, no commercial activity involved please accept the same

i have changed it — Preceding unsigned comment added by Insubbu (talk • contribs) 06:23, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dear @Insubbu:, as per WP:NOR; original research articles cannot be added to wikipedia. Wikipedia can be used to create an article that can be referenced from outside. - Abhilashkrishn (talk) 06:31, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK - abhilashkrishn ^talk 08:47, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

speedy deletion

What is your problem I haven't even finish the topic but you want to contest to delete the topic you are very dumb editor. comment added by Jeramenzation (talk • contribs) 18:30, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The wikipedia is not for experimenting things. If you need to create new articles, create it in sandbox first and then move it to main. Also always provide citation in your articles. Auto biographical without reference would get deleted.

- abhilashkrishn ^talk 19:39, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Dyana Sofya Mohd Daud

The article has references to it. Don't simply put all rubbish tag to it. --113.210.6.47 (talk) 18:42, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Articles without significance and notable events would gets deleted. If you are preparing new articles, please try sandbox first. - abhilashkrishn ^talk 19:48, 31 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion declined: Nandimithra SC

Hello Abhilashkrishn. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nandimithra SC, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: "They play in the topflight football league of Sri Lanka, the Sri Lanka Premier League" - indicates some significance at least. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 05:57, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Shirt58:OK. But do we have a source for that? - abhilashkrishn ^talk 10:01, 1 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Closed AfD

I'm just here to give you a head's up that I've proceedurally closed the first AfD for HSC Examination 2014 Question Leak. The second one is the more visible and active of the two, so I figure that closing the first one will keep the discussion all in one AfD page for the most part. I see that you're already active in the second AfD page so you're already aware of the location of the second AfD, so I won't post it here. I just wanted to let you know just in case you see it or wanted to go back to the first page. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 08:34, 2 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop misrepresenting sources

Please stop misrepresenting sources at Bangalore Days. The sources DO NOT support claim of "overwhelming" praise from critics. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:10, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: You are wrong. The source clearly states overwhelming response. - abhilashkrishn ^talk 02:12, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

sources clearly DO NOT - one says overwhelming BOX OFFICE. Proclaiming from such a limit set of reviews that there is "overwhelming" is completely in violation of WP:OR - making claims that are not explicitly within the source. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:33, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: Sure. I have cleaned up the claimed statement that is more suitable according to the review. - abhilashkrishn ^talk 02:41, 10 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Please refrain from abusing warning or blocking templates, as you did to User talk:TheRedPenOfDoom. Doing so is a violation of Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:38, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@NeilN: I have not abused any warning templeate, I have used the standard wiki template for giving notices and warnings. Please clarify your point. - abhilashkrishn ^talk 19:43, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

NeilN/TheRedPenofDoom SPI

I have Rejected the SPI you filed on NeilN/TheRedPenofDoom because editors normally help each other out on talkpages like that. Plus with ~60k edits vs. ~90k edits, someone would have realized by now and no one has ever gone that extensive into socking. Also if you could please make sure you add diffs for evidence when you file and SPI, it helps us out. -- DQ (ʞlɐʇ) 23:01, 19 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@DeltaQuad:Sure, I might be wrong. Have a good day! - abhilashkrishn ^talk 18:35, 21 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Gamergate Controversy Article

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Gamergate controversy, as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Adding references and external links is not considered a minor edit. Thank you. Strongjam (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Strongjam:I thought that was a minor edit because it is the official GamerGate website, Sorry. Numerous articles have published reference for GamerGate website. Examples GamerGate's scary plan to wipe Gawker Media from the face of the Earth and official reddit forum https://www.reddit.com/r/KotakuInAction/wiki/index - abhilashkrishn ^talk 13:33, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's a leaderless movement so it's hard to say anything is official. The link has been added before and removed. You can try to get consensus to add it in the talk page, but you'll probably get quite a bit of resistance. I suspect some editors see it as a WP:BLP issue due to the contents. -- Strongjam (talk) 13:39, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@Strongjam: But which part of the WP:BLP policy is not met here. I think external links can be added as the source is from reputable news media, all the three policy points of WP:BLP met with this. I request you to include your opinion about this. - abhilashkrishn ^talk 13:47, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Added my opinion on the talk page. I'm not invoking WP:BLP. It's just my opinion that other editors will. -- Strongjam (talk) 13:51, 31 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read this notification carefully:
A community discussion has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the Gamergate controversy.
The details of these sanctions are described here.

General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

-- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 05:40, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

@TheRedPenOfDoom: Thanks dude for informing. - abhilashkrishn ^talk 05:50, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Requsting for my articel Jaishankar chigurula keep

hi sir my self teena my article Jaishankar Chigurla is in Deletion policy. please help me to keep the article Jaishankar Chigurla. are create.Teena D'souza (talk) 07:27, 22 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

New deal for page patrollers

Hi Abhilashkrishn,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:28, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:09, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Suggested addition to Milo Yiannopoulos' wiki page.

Milo openly advocated for pedophilia. ^[1] ^[2] 93.126.151.156 (talk) 23:03, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-- Twitter is not verifiable source.- abhilashkrishn ^talk 20:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Thirumandhamkunnu Pooram) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Thirumandhamkunnu Pooram, Abhilashkrishn!

Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Thanks for taking the time and trouble to create this - it's appreciated. It's now been reviewed and has had some improvement tags added. If you have the time, could you look it over and see if you can help address any of the issues raised in the tags? Thanks again for your hard work.

To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Boleyn (talk) 16:08, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Boleyn: Thank you for the inputs. I have made the changes, please review it if you got spare time. abhilashkrishn ^talk 17:35, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wow, htat was quick! Thank you, looks good. Boleyn (talk) 18:10, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User Malayalam Wikipedia

You can add this template in your user page.Template:User Malayalam Wikipedia.--Path slopu (talk) 10:47, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Abhilashkrishn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:26, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/833347036644777985

[2] ttps://twitter.com/ReaganBattalion/status/833405993006616576

[1]

[2]