User talk:Addisons006

May 2020

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Eggplant—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 10:30, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Eggplant, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 14:09, 29 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

June 2020

Hello, I'm Thibaut120094. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Roger Stevens (poet)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Thibaut (talk) 14:17, 26 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

August 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Albert Einstein, you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. - DVdm (talk) 21:27, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Eggplant. - DVdm (talk) 21:29, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 12:43, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Addisons006 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am not a vandalism only account i add helpful links to peoples bios Addisons006 (talk) 09:24, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Plenty of blatant vandalism from this address. I didn't find a single example of you adding helpful links to people's bios. It's possible you did occasionally add helpful links and I just couldn't find these examples, but in general, you are harmful to the project and are deservedly blocked. Yamla (talk) 09:44, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your mother Addisons006 (talk) 14:29, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user has engaged in block evasion and sockpuppetry as 16oaddison. --Yamla (talk) 14:30, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Don’t know what your on about m8 Addisons006 (talk) 14:31, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unban me please mate Addisons006 (talk) 14:43, 3 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]