User talk:Agrovista

Welcome to Wikipedia!!!

Hello Agrovista! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. You may also push the signature button

located above the edit window. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. This is considered an important guideline in Wikipedia. Even a short summary is better than no summary. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! -- Chavatshimshon 04:16, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial How to edit a page The five pillars of Wikipedia Manual of Style Be bold in editing How to write a great article WikiProjects
Getting your info out there
Cite your sources Neutral Point of View Point of View Verifiability Uploading images Image use policy
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Policy Library

Getting Help
New contributors' help page Where to ask a question Help Desk Frequently Asked Questions
Getting along
Wikiquette Civility Sign your posts Wikipedians Conflict resolution
Getting technical
Cleaning up vandalism Pages needing attention Peer review Utilities Village pump

May 2021

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Ricky Schroder. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ricky Schroder

You clearly have a POV you are trying to push. Please stop. Also, your additions to the article are ungrammatical which is not helpful. Continuing to edit Wikipedia in this way can be viewed as vandalism. Thank you. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:23, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You clearly have a POV as well, I am trying to make it clear that it was not an apology it was justification for harassment of an employee that has no control over company rules or state laws, Ricky Schroeder say this in his video. What he says sorry for is Using him and Hurting his feelings if he did.

If your complaints over my edits are Grammatical you can fix them rightAgrovista (talk) 16:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no POV, but your edit here clearly displays one. Please read and understand WP:NPOV. We present what the sources say in a dispassionate manner. Clearly you are struggling to do that in this case, and want to insert opinion into the article.

Seriously, if you struggle to write proper English you should find a better way to use your time. Cleaning up articles is a waste of other people's time. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:40, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

So what if it said Shortly after the incident, Schroder began receiving backlash, causing him to upload a second video justifying his mask opposition and apologizing to the employee for "using him"

I am seriously trying to make this a correct accounting of the situation I am not trolling you Agrovista (talk) 16:45, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No, because "justifying" is not WP:NPOV. causing him to upload a second video apologizing to the employee "if I hurt your feelings" whilst reiterating his opposition to being made to wear a mask is better. The bit about using him is hard to get in there as a direct quote (which it would have to be) and not that important anyway. Lard Almighty (talk) 16:56, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome we have an agreement Agrovista (talk) 17:08, 18 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jason Weisberger

Hello, Agrovista

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Jason Weisberger, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales^Parley 00:34, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jason Weisberger

Hello Agrovista,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Jason Weisberger for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

VickKiang (talk) 02:38, 31 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Agrovista/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Agrovista! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 15:09, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Agrovista/sandbox

Hello, Agrovista. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:33, 1 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]