User talk:Akashdeep dasgupta
Hello, Akashdeep dasgupta, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.
- Please sign your name on talk pages, by using four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically produce your username and the date, and helps to identify who said what and when. Please do not sign any edit that is not on a talk page.
- Check out some of these pages:
- If you have a question that is not one of the frequently asked questions below, check out the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click the button below. Happy editing and again, welcome! Rasnaboy (talk) 09:55, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
- Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
- Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
- In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
- Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
- Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like
<ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing). - In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
- If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
Disambiguation link notification for October 27[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
- Ashwatthama
- List of characters in the Mahabharata
- added a link pointing to Tara
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 27 October 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 3[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ashwatthama, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Krodha and Uttara.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 12[edit]
An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
November 2022[edit]
You have made repeated and unexplained disruptive edits on various articles such as Kartikeya, Pradyumna, Kala, Kripa, and others over the past few days - All of which have been reverted, and shall continue to be reverted in the future if you maintain your present course, because you engage in the inappropriate removal of cited content, POV pushing, and addition of uncited content. If you wish to make your contributions stick, I suggest you add cited content, stop removing cited content, stop pushing your personal views on articles, and include short descriptions to explain your additions. Chronikhiles (talk) 13:38, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
I have made the changes not on basis of my personal views but on the basis of what I have studied thus far. I challange u to go through any text from our scriptures and prove my edits wrong. What I have said in my edits r completely according to Epics and Puranas. Bdw Wikipedia is a public forum of articles and if I see some incomplete articles or some falsely published articles on this forums then i have 100% right to edit and complete or correct them as per my knowledge. If u want me to stop doing it either make ur articles then wither make the pages private or do the corrections urself by studying the epics and Puranas urself 1st. Coz whatever u published in ur articles r either incomplete, or false. For eg: Rudra is never mentioned as another name of Vayu only Shiva is known by that name according to all the Puranas and Epics where as Vayu is known to be a Maruta but u guys completely manipulated this part of the Hanuman article and made Rudra another name of Vayu without a single proof and calling Hanuman as a Shiv amsha only according to Shiva Purana where as there r multiple Puranas claiming Hanuman to be Shiva or Rudra avatar. So do ur job with honesty and I will stop bothering abt all this wasting my tym editing ur mistakes. Akashdeep dasgupta (talk) 03:35, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
- As per this website's editorial policy, I don't have to disprove any of your edits, the responsibility is yours to add reliable sources to your contributions. You have not. You may have studied ABC, believe XYZ - none of it matters; unless you have the sources to back up your contributions - from Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources. That is all. I repeat what I said: All your future contributions shall continue to be reverted in the future if you maintain your present course, because you engage in the inappropriate removal of cited content, POV pushing, and addition of uncited content. If you continue to do this, you could very well be reported, by other editors or I, and action could be taken against you. Please note that you have been warned regarding this. Chronikhiles (talk) 10:44, 23 November 2022 (UTC)
December 2022[edit]
In the light of you persisting in your actions, I have brought your activity to attention on the Wikipedia:Teahouse. Chronikhiles (talk) 08:08, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Unsourced material and clarifying the above[edit]
Hello @Akashdeep dasgupta. Thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. However, I wanted to clarify some of the above messages you received. Not all of your reverted edits were disruptive, and I have mentioned this while talking to Chronikhiles. But, some of the edits were unsourced. We need to cite our sources when we add stuff to Wikipedia, or it could be untrue and we wouldn't know. These don't have to be from Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Perennial sources as mentioned before, in fact, you don't really need to worry about that for now. And, I just wanted to tell you that you will not be blocked for this at the moment. If you made consistent unsourced edits, maybe you could, but you would be warned multiple times before that happened. You are learning how the site works, and no one will block you for that.
For more information, you can check out Wikipedia:Verifiability and Wikipedia:CITE.
Once again, thanks a lot for your contributions!!! echidnaLives - talk - edits 11:10, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Reversion[edit]
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Chronikhiles (talk) 11:28, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view: We strive for articles in an impartial tone that document and explain major points of view, giving due weight for their prominence. We avoid advocacy, and we characterize information and issues rather than debate them. In some areas there may be just one well-recognized point of view; in others, we describe multiple points of view, presenting each accurately and in context rather than as "the truth" or "the best view". All articles must strive for verifiable accuracy, citing reliable, authoritative sources, especially when the topic is controversial or is about a living person. Editors' personal experiences, interpretations, or opinions do not belong on Wikipedia. Chronikhiles (talk) 11:44, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 26[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avatars in the Mahabharata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vali.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 January 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 21[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avatars in the Mahabharata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krodha.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 21 May 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avatars in the Mahabharata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Krodha.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 28 June 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for August 7[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Avatars in the Mahabharata, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bhanumati.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 7 August 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 28 November 2023 (UTC)