User talk:Alena.svinareva

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by I dream of horses was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, SPUTNIX, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Alena.svinareva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Alena.svinareva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 12:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia! Need a hand?

Hello, Alena.svinareva! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 12:22, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

«Sputnix» article

@I dream of horses: Sorry, both articles created by me. I can't find the first one nowhere and thought than I've done it incorrectly and recreate it. How can I publish the article faster?

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Alena.svinareva

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Alena.svinareva, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. (See section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion.)

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. creffett (talk) 19:37, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SPUTNIX (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SPUTNIX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SPUTNIX, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 21:54, 26 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SPUTNIX (July 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No real change still reads like an ad.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SPUTNIX and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SPUTNIX, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispering^(t) 19:58, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SPUTNIX has been accepted

SPUTNIX, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:33, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Alena.svinareva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to SPUTNIX. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! –MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:34, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your persistence paid off, and by the time I reviewed the article it was in good enough shape to get accepted! Thank you for your work here.

–MJL ‐Talk‐^☖ 00:41, 16 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

December 2019

Hello Alena.svinareva. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, such as the edit you made to SPUTNIX, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Alena.svinareva. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Alena.svinareva|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 13:59, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Justlettersandnumbers (talk) I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits. I added new information in this article

I fear that that is untrue, though I'm not free to say why I think so without your express permission. Since you chose to make further promotional edits after I had asked you not to edit again without making proper disclosure, I have blocked your account – please see below. Oh, and the content I've just removed from Sputnix was also a copyright violation. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:30, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Justlettersandnumbers (talk) Thank you for catching me in a lie. I don't understand why you believe that my edits are promotional, new edits are only news of company. I am an employee of that company and I know what the company is doing at the moment and only try to convey relevant information about the company, but this is not my responsibility, only my own initiative. Yes, I tried to make corrections to the article directly, but only because I did not fully understand the rules of Wikipedia, and not because I am paid for it. Please unblock my account and I will make further edits to the moderation of administrators.

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 17:18, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Alena.svinareva (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry, but I don't make promotional edits, only news of company. I am an employee of that company and I know what the company is doing at the moment and only try to convey relevant information about the company, but this is not my responsibility, only my own initiative. The company is actively developing and entering the world market. This year, it is planned to launch several nanosatellites developed by the company. I just want the company's achievements to be known around the world via Wikipedia. Yes, I tried to make corrections to the article directly, but only because I did not fully understand the rules of Wikipedia. Please unblock my account and I will make further edits to the moderation of administrators.

Decline reason:

If you truly believe your edits weren't promotional then you are too close to the company to be able to objectively write about it. You also haven't shown where you made the mandatory disclosure of your conflict of interest, as required by WP:COI. You won't be unblocked to continue writing about your company. If there's a subject area you wish to write about instead, one for which you have no conflict, tell us what that is. Yamla (talk) 12:17, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Note while my decline of your unblock request was, I'm sure, disappointing, I sincerely and honestly wish you and your company good luck with your endeavours. Private space companies are magnificent and this is a thrilling time to be alive. You must be so excited to work for a company deeply involved with this. I think it's absolutely wonderful that you have satellites in orbit. :) --Yamla (talk) 12:20, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla Yes, it is really so exciting to be so close to space! Thank you for your kind words! Alena.svinareva (talk) 12:26, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]