User talk:Alexander Vigo

Welcome

Hello, Alexander Vigo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already loving Wikipedia you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Salvio ( ^{Let's talk 'bout it!}) 20:46, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Pages needing attention • Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Hi

Is this account you or someone you know? He recently created a page about the Gallaecian language, but I couldn't find any information about it online so I changed it into a redirect to the Continental Celtic languages page. I asked him for more information, but he never edited again. But now I see you're at work creating more articles about ancient Gallaecia. Whether you and Boudiviros are the same person or whether this is just a coincidence, I'm curious if you think you'd be able to help with the Gallaecian language article. (With sources that can be verified, preferably online.) —Soap— 22:21, 8 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Compostela's Era

A tag has been placed on The Compostela's Era requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MicroX (talk) 07:32, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This read too much like an essay and there was absolutely no evidence that this is an established term. If you think a new article is justified, I suggest you seek support at Talk:Kingdom of Galicia. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:25, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spain

I reverted your recent edit as the term commonly used in Spain and in literature about Spain is Goths. Jezhotwells (talk) 23:36, 8 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Graças

Graças, meu :-) O nosso património bem merece o pequeno esforço extra.--Froaringus (talk) 15:32, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ola, meu. Grazas de novo :-) Dis ben co aquel da falta de bibliografía: temos centos de topónimos no país que merecerían estar na lista, mais para os que non coñezo ou non dispoño de referencias (ou para os que as autores reclaman unha orixe prelatina, sen explicitamente defender a súa celticidade). Con todo, teño xa en carteira unha ducia máis (Ambas Mestas, Condado, Luentia, Bendia... Lubre!) que irei incorporando xunto coas referencias oportunas. De feito, ehem, probabelmente xa fixen unha interpretación moi xenerosa das normas nalgún dos topónimos incorporados, e probabelmente é preferíbel abrir o apetito do lector mellor que saturarlle as papilas gustativas. Un abrazo, compañeiro.----Froaringus (talk) 18:03, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

And thanks to you too! :-) --Froaringus (talk) 13:36, 29 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Romanesque

Ola, compañeiro. Pois como ben dis, unha galería excesiva pode estragar o asunto, e deixándome levar polo gosto polo románico penso que xa me excedín :-) Poida que sexa preferíbel unha obra representativa de cada período? Honestamente, meu, modifícao ao teu parecer! --Froaringus (talk) 05:56, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A beer for you!

É-che boa cousa ter-che outra vez por acó. Saúde! Froaringus (talk) 14:26, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Galicia

Ok! Moi limpo, asi que ben por min. Saúde, meu. --Froaringus (talk) 14:59, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Name of Galicia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Eo, Navia and Cea

Decimus Junius Brutus Callaicus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Galicia

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Crown of Castile - Map.gif

Hello
I see you created the file mentioned in the headline. There are several things wrong with the file. First, 'anexion' should be spelled 'annexation'. Also, 'Lost of Galicia' should be 'Loss of Galicia'. Lastly, 'Abollition of the Crown' should be ' Abolition of the Crown'.
Could you please fix these?
Thanks. 86.97.186.109 (talk) 09:03, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Galician people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ferrol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 19 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:25, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]