User talk:Ali aff

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search



Hello, Ali aff! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Faizan 05:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do

Copyright problems with Sohail wajahat[edit]

Ambox warning pn.svg

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sohail wajahat, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from\02\08\story_8-2-2009_pg15_1. As a copyright violation, Sohail wajahat appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sohail wajahat has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

  • If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sohail wajahat and send an email with the message to See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
  • If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Sohail wajahat with a link to where we can find that note.
  • If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sohail wajahat.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. Hekerui (talk) 13:01, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Orologio rosso or File:Orologio verde DOT SVG (red clock or green clock icon, from Wikimedia Commons)
This blocked user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ali aff (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblock)

Request reason:

global block — Sorry for that, however, I did mention the source for that data, additionally, if you know "Dailytimes" is a newspaper in Pakistan and the news are normally do not fall under copy right acts unless script is taken, which is not valid in my case, Kindly unblock

Decline reason:

This account isn't blocked, but would like to know which you are wanting unblocked.  f o x  (formerly garden) 15:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first and then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired.

I don't see a block on your account, but I do see something a little odd; is there any connection between this account and User:PaulMacnamara? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:04, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

I would greatly appreciate seeing a list of all accounts you have registered on Wikipedia. Hersfold (t/a/c) 14:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

July 2011[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Ajmal Kasab. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Sodabottle (talk) 12:41, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

July 2013[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Vigyani. I noticed that you made a change to an article, 2008 Mumbai attacks, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 05:48, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi you deleted my contribution for which the source was provided from the newspaper "Times of India". I want this new development to be added in this article. Please advice what is incorrect in that so that i amend and re-contribute.

Read comment at my talk page and open a discuss at article talk page. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:59, 18 July 2013 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Ali aff. You have new messages at Vigyani's talk page.
Message added 07:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 07:57, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Stop icon

Your recent editing history at 2008 Mumbai attacks shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 08:01, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Vigyani --- i am just trying to be right in my contribution, no way engaging in edit war. i have added the sources and reworded the contribution, but nothing works, kindlu advice how this allegation matter can be included in the article.

Hi Ali Aff, I am happy about you. For you I have opened a thread, whose link I have provided at the bottom. When there is a dispute about the content, we discuss the content on article talk page. You can comment there and other editor will also be commenting and then we wait for few days and form a consensus. --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 11:50, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

You can comment here[edit]

Hi, I have opened thread for you. You can comment on Talk:2008_Mumbai_attacks#Recent_dispute_about_allegation --Vigyanitalkਯੋਗਦਾਨ 08:28, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]

Promoting fringe theories at Mumbai Attacks[edit]

Hello there. I have noticed that you are promoting a WP:FRINGE theory that the Mumbai Attacks were an inside job.[1][2] That's disruptive. Please stop.William Jockusch (talk) 16:20, 11 August 2013 (UTC)