User talk:Alialanezi33

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Alanezi (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AngusWOOF were:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Still reads like a resume / personal statement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Alanezi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ali Alanezi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Alialanezi33! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! AngusW🐶🐶F (bark • sniff) 00:27, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What can I do to get it verified Alialanezi333 (talk) 15:48, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Ali Alanezi, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Alialanezi33/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Alialanezi33/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 02:53, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ali Alanezi

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ali Alanezi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

G11: obvious intent as a resume; WP:NOTWEBHOST

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 03:29, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bishonen | tålk 12:14, 24 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your persistent re-submission of an article about yourself after several rejections suggests you are only here for self-promotion. Feel free to appeal this block per the instructions above, if you do have an intention to contribute to the encyclopedia. Bishonen | tålk 12:16, 24 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

You, the person, have been blocked. Please don't create sockpuppet accounts

Hi again, Alialanezi33. You are blocked. That means you, the person, are blocked from editing Wikipedia — not just this account. You are not allowed to evade the block by creating other accounts, such as User:Alialanezi333, which I have just blocked. What you can do is appeal this block. Log into your original account, User:Alialanezi33, and follow the instructions above for appealing the block. Explain why you think you should be unblocked, and what edits you intend to make if you're unblocked. Bishonen | tålk 16:02, 24 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

I just discovered Alialanezi333 is the older account, so it's this account that's a sock. Doesn't make any difference; both accounts have been used exclusively for self-promotion. You can appeal the block either here, or at User talk:Alialanezi333. Bishonen | tålk 16:12, 24 January 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Your draft article, User:Alialanezi33/sandbox

Hello, Alialanezi33. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 04:26, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]