User talk:Alphabetagamnma

Regarding the page United States, please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. android 79 13:11, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gurajada & Welcome and India related links

Welcome!

Hello Alphabetagamnma, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

	Links for Wikipedians interested in India content
Newcomers: Welcome kit \| Register: Indian Wikipedians \| Network: Noticeboard (WP:INWNB) Browse: India \| Open tasks \| Deletions Contribute content: Wikiportal India - Indian current events (WP:INCE) India collaboration of the week (WP:INCOTW) - Category adoptions

Hi, good improvement to Gurajada article. Also, have a look at WP:IUP. Definitely, wrt the Kanyasulkam DVD cover, it can be said that it is fair use only and not the tag you placed. Welcome!! --Gurubrahma 14:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Gurajada Apparao

Hi, please see Talk:Gurajada Apparao. You seem to be re-adding the same material again. Also, a google test suggests that the spelling "Gurajada" is more widely used than "Gurazada." --Gurubrahma 09:04, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry if I was not clear before and if you have not understood what I was saying, as a result of that. The material that you and an anon IP have been adding is about the play and not its playwright. Hence, I moved that information to the article on the play, Kanyasulkam. You may want to have a look at that. I would be reverting your addition to Gurajada Apparao as it does not fit there. Thanks, --Gurubrahma 09:14, 8 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright Violations

Dear Sir,

I have gone through some of your contributions for images and all I could find was copyvio images. We cannot have non-commercial images on Wikipedia and we cannot have pictures from http://www.dudes.org/ since we are taking away that website's business by hosting the photos here. I ask you please not to upload images from there. Zach ^{(Smack Back) Fair use policy} 18:51, 16 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are still continuing to upload images with the claim that the copyright holder has released the images for any use when this claim cannot be verified. Please stop using missleading tags. Consider this your last wrning. Wikipedia takes copyright violoations seriously. Further uploads with missleading copyright tags will result in you being blocked. --GraemeL ^(talk) 18:54, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for continuing to upload images with misleading copyright information. You are welcome to continue editing after the block expires, but further incidents of misrepresenting the status of copyrighted images will lead to more blocks. --GraemeL ^(talk) 12:46, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked again. Please stop uploading images claiming that the copyright holder has released them for any purpose when you have no proof to back up these claims. --GraemeL ^(talk) 18:03, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The reason why you keep on being blocked is that you keep on trying to upload images that you do not hold the copyright for, but you are claiming that the photos are yours and that we can do what we want with them. That is not acceptable, since you are not the copyright holder, you have no rights to do whatever you want to the image. And, since the picture is not yours, you cannot tell us "oh, go ahead and use it." What you have been doing is lying about the copyrights, and we cannot have users do that here. And, as you can tell, your continuation of this have caused you to be blocked. After your block period is over, please cease uploading photos that do not belong to you. If you continue doing what you are doing, I have no choice to have you blocked indef., since what you are doing is hurtful to the project, and also illegal. User:Zscout370 ^{(Return Fire) Fair use policy} 19:59, 21 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Welling

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Tom Welling. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. NawlinWiki 12:24, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Tom Welling, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --PTSE 13:55, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Colin Farrell.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Colin Farrell.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:04, 6 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Tom Welling.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom Welling.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 04:07, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Welling

Please stop vandalising the Tom Welling article. If you have something against him, don't take your anger out on wikipedia. Ivan Kricancic 12:04, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Tom Welling's Bulge.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom Welling's Bulge.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 17 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Tom Welling's Bulge.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Tom Welling's Bulge.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ivan Kricancic 06:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Tom Welling in action.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Tom Welling in action.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}. If you have not already done so, please also include the source of the image. In many cases this will be the website where you found it.

Please specify the copyright information and source on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator. If you have any questions, feel free to contact me, or ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Abu Badali 18:50, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Image:SP1.jpg

An image that you uploaded, Image:SP1.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

-- Bungopolis 08:45, 8 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Arundhati . Roy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arundhati . Roy.jpg. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. GraemeL ^(talk) 10:56, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I've previously blocked you twice for uploading images with incorrect copyright information. You have been blocked again, for one week, for continuing to provide misleading copyright information on the images you upload. If you do this again, I will block you indefinitely until such a time as you agree to stop your actions which could cause legal problems for the Wikipedia Foundation. --GraemeL ^(talk) 10:59, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Arundhati_Roy.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arundhati_Roy.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:09, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Vandals are destroying articles related to Andhra Pradesh, Telugu language, Telugu script and many articles related to Telugu history. These people, about eight, have ganged up and are helping each other to prevent unbiased contributions. The history of South India and even that of the whole of India is being painted as that belonged to a linguistic group. History is being re-written on the basis of a couple of books written by parchial and localized historians and a couple of websites devoted to regional agenda and chauvantic tendencies. A perusal of their contributions and citations will make my point obvious. I appeal to you to regularly visit Telugu and Andhra-relted articles and prevent vandalism by these mischief makers.Kumarrao 09:53, 31 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

August 2008

Thank you for your recent contributions to the Tom Welling article. While the Wikipedia community appreciates your efforts to increase the amount of information on the site, we cannot accept sources which appear to be the original work of the editor. If the material you added can be attributed to a reliable source, you may add it back if you cite it. This increases the reputation of Wikipedia as a whole and aids in the verifiability of the article. --Ebyabe (talk) 23:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:36, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]