User talk:Amanaparts
Amanaparts, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi Amanaparts! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC) |
December 2016
[edit]Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to War crimes in the Kosovo War, did not appear constructive and has been undone. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 00:42, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
- All changes have been made based on independent sources for the sake of accuracy. The articles I contributed to are poorly quoted and contain inaccurate or wrong quotation. Some of the information's do not even have a source and only serve as propaganda. I did not violate any policy or guideline since my sole purpose for edition is to improve the articles by considering relevant sources or deleting text without sources.
Amanaparts (talk) 10:49, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at War crimes in the Kosovo War. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 17:55, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Telephone numbers in Serbia, you may be blocked from editing. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 18:02, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit that you made to User talk:Anastan has been reverted or removed because it was a misuse of a warning or blocking template. Please use the user warnings sandbox for any tests you may want to do, or take a look at our introduction page to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 18:36, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
You MUST stop with your edits and reverts. Use talk page to gain consensus. If not, you will be blocked from editing. --Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 18:37, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
I understand that you are not a new user. You immediately, upon creation, asked for changes in article protection. Please don't warn experienced users. You need to explain your revert. The authors are reliable, political scientists. Can you refute it?--Zoupan 21:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Zoupan: if you want any edits please use talk page to gain consensus. The book itself does not show any sources of their claims. If you want to add sources, prove reliability.
ARBMAC warning
[edit]Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Balkans, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.--Ąnαșταη (ταlκ) 18:41, 21 December 2016 (UTC)
Since you even template the veterans... ;)
[edit]Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. FkpCascais (talk) 22:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)
Edit warring at Kosovo Liberation Army
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
.During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
The full report is at the edit warring noticeboard. Thank you, EdJohnston (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)