User talk:Amband

September 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Pontius Pilate, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. HokieRNB 12:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)

my statement was factual Amband (talk) 00:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Scouts Australia

Whatever your point is on Scouts Australia, and it is certainly not clear to me, please take it to the talk page - Talk:Scouts Australia. That is where we discuss the article, not on the article itself.

--Bduke (Discussion) 07:28, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

it's clear to me and anyone who is aware of scouts history Amband (talk) 05:05, 26 December 2022 (UTC)

No, my statement is meant for public consumption and it's true Amband (talk) 00:44, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jewish-American organized crime, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Hmains (talk) 15:17, 17 July 2011 (UTC)

i gave fact as as well Amband (talk) 00:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

I gave recorded historical fact, which can verify by looking

July 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Sexton. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. gråb whåt you cån (talk) 18:17, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

reason was accuracy

October 2013

Hello, I'm Adabow. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Lorde without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Adabow (talk) 07:06, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lorde, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Information on Lorde's ancestry (different from her nationality) is supported by cited, reliable sources and is clearly important to the artist, even if YOU think it shouldn't be. Please STOP removing it or risk being blocked. Dwpaul (talk) 14:10, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

what I said was factual. Next time I'll use summary Amband (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Edward Heath. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:31, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

everytginh I said was the truth and public knowledge Amband (talk) 00:46, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Heath's history is public knowledge. What I said is accurate. My post was constructive as that is the history, as recorded

May 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Wright brothers. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 03:42, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

they're facts that are publicly available Amband (talk) 00:48, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

what the hell are you talking about? I never offer points of view. If you bother to check what I edit with sources you will find it's actual history. It is true, and why you would type this message without checking is not good

Please stop censoring and making up history. Read " Aeronautics in Hargreave's wiki

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Errol Flynn may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• metals mining. He spent the next five years oscillating between the New Guinea frontier territory > Flynn worked as a " Kiap " ( patrol officer } in New Guinea, an Australian protectorate and Sydney.<ref>Moore, John Hammond 'The Young Errol

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:23, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

April 2020

Hello, I'm TheImaCow. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Australia–China relations—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. TheImaCow (talk) 07:10, 30 April 2020 (UTC)

Thelma. All you need do is refer to history books and you'll see I'm right. History is history and is not there to fit a wiki entry Amband (talk) 05:04, 26 December 2022 (UTC)