User talk:American Zionist

Hi American Zionist! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

18:30, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

Important Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in the Arab–Israeli conflict. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:37, 27 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

April 2019[edit]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 14:03, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also at Talk:Antifa (United States)‎. Talkpages aren't for general discussion of personal opinions. Acroterion (talk) 14:06, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

These are not general opionions , they are discussions to add balance to a POV page.American Zionist (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talkpage discussions are expected to be supported by reliable sourcing leading to specific suggestions for article improvement. They are not a free forum to express your distaste for a given topic, or for partisan complaints Acroterion (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice[edit]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Acroterion (talk) 14:09, 28 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Stop!!![edit]

You are extremely disruptive here. Please take the time to read and understand WP:BATTLEGROUND and WP:RIGHTGREATWRONGS before editing further. I hope and expect your future edits will be radically different from the edits you've made so far and you will start adhering to Wikipedia policies and guidelines. --Yamla (talk) 13:38, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions, you may be blocked from editing. As User:Acroterion pointed out. In particular, by suggesting a living person is a terrorist, a probable BLP violation - if our article Omar Barghouti called him a terrorist it wouldn't be a BLP violation, but it doesn't, and even if it did, you are still misusing the talk page. If this continues you might find yourself topic-banned or blocked. Just in case you think I have ulterior motives, one reason I might stop voting Labour is because they have been unable to deal with the serious problem of anti-Semitism in the party (and Corbyn's writing a forward to a book laced with anti-Semitism without pointing that out was unexcusable). Doug Weller talk 13:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Antifa for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 13:41, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I put a link that the NJ DHS has declared Antifa a terrorist group. what is the problem?American Zionist (talk) 13:45, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Fine then lets allow the edit that Omar Barghouti started the BDS and he supports the destruction of Israel. that his own words. I see a bias against anything that pants Israel in a positive light.American Zionist (talk) 13:48, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you find the article from New Jersey? The url was [https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa] but it doesn't work, and when it did (I read it) it did not say terrorist. A search for Antifa and 2017 turns up zilch.[1] There was a section heading called "inciting violence" which said he examples are "an Antifa member wrote, “Every Nazi that gets punched is a victory. . . . We must realize that these days are going to become more and more common, unless we put a nail in this coffin once and for all.” On March 29, as a response to an Antifa post on social media, a national militia group wrote in an online article, “Whenever their kind [Antifa] assumes power, individual freedom, including of speech and worship, is brutally suppressed.” "Beginning in March, the Philadelphia Antifa Chapter used Facebook to encourage followers to disrupt a “Make America Great Again” event in Philadelphia, resulting in over 300 participants. Antifa’s presence resulted in law enforcement shutting down the event early for safety concerns. As of May, a manual on how to form an Antifa group—posted on a well-known Anarchist website in February—had approximately 13,500 views." and "On February 1, the University of California Berkeley canceled a controversial speaker’s appearance following a protest by approximately 100 Antifa members. In response, far-right extremists assembled at a free-speech rally, which Antifa members disrupted, resulting in 10 arrests and seven injuries. Additionally, on April 15, Antifa and far-right extremists clashed at a demonstration, leading to 23 arrests and 11 injuries" Your source dlied about what New Jersey said, it did not call Antifa a terrorist group.

Please read again the notices above about sanctions as you're skating on thin ice. Doug Weller talk 13:56, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page United Nations Human Rights Council has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. This edit[2] was not a "Consensus edit from talk page". You had one IP whose only recent edit was to the talk page and you. That's not a consensus. Doug Weller talk 14:00, 4 May 2019 (UTC) Here is the DHS link http://conservative-headlines.org/antifa-officially-declared-a-terrorist-group-by-new-jerseys-dhs/[reply]

Regard Human Rights council if no objects how is this not one that should be made.American Zionist (talk) 14:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am making points on talk pages for the most part. I put references and they are deemed not valid. Why? American Zionist (talk) 14:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'll cut to the chase - attempt to hide vandalism that way again, and you'll be blocked. Acroterion (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. TonyBallioni (talk) 14:04, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock| I have made points on primary the talk pages, some admins and editors have a problem with a differing point of view. I have back them up with links and refrences. I wanted to add balance to the BDS page gave reasoning and was attacked for it. I use the anaolgy of the KKK which is not their description of themselves and said it should relate to the BDS, I put a refrence thatNJ DHS has declared Antifa a terrorist group. What is the problem. I am having my post dleted those are the users that should be sanctioned.Acoterion in particular.American Zionist (talk) 14:10, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You appear to be here to push a particular point of view. That is not allowed.
You really need to read up on our reliable sources rules. "Conservative Headlines" is not a reliable source. Their Statement of Principles is blatantly partisan & indicates a desire to sway opinion rather than report fact.
Finally, your unblock request is not properly formatted. Try reading the instructions again. — The Hand That Feeds You:^Bite 14:32, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

American Zionist (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am being putting points primarily on talk pages that some admins and editors find unreliable. Not actually reading the articles. Actoreon in particular is the problem.American Zionist (talk) 14:43, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You are the problem. You will not be unblocked unless you convince an admin that you understand and accept this, and tell us how your future edits would be significantly different from your existing edits. You may also have to propose a topic ban. Yamla (talk) 15:02, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Admin who have done this are facists who are afraid to go outside their bubble. they know they are wrong. I made legitimite posts.American Zionist (talk) 15:13, 4 May 2019 (UTC) I will also edit as I see fit everytime I am at a new wifi location, screw you.American Zionist (talk) 15:15, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access removed - calling editors Fascists and stating you will sock confirms the block is correct[edit]

Doug Weller talk 15:19, 4 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]