User talk:Amir8022

Welcome!

Hello, Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Mario Mandžukić has not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and has been or will be removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. Additionally, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Qed237 (talk) 14:58, 21 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Fatih Terim, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:33, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ok Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi (talk) 12:09, 2 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ali Joudaki moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Ali Joudaki, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:54, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ali Joudaki (September 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Ali Joudaki instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Two copies of this page have been created, in draft space and in article space. It is not necessary to create two copies of the same page, and it annoys the reviewers. This is sometimes done in order to bypass Articles for Creation review. However, if a submitter is ready to have the article in article space, it can be moved into article space, rather than creating a copy. It is common for a page that has been duplicated in draft space and in article space to be nominated for deletion or proposed for deletion. If the article is kept, this draft should be redirected to the article. If the article is deleted, this draft may be kept for future improvement.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ali Joudaki and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ali Joudaki, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

September 2021

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Ali Joudaki. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:44, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to this inappropriate edit Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Ali Joudaki. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:45, 19 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ali Joudaki for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ali Joudaki, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.

The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ali Joudaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:02, 20 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

June 2022

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Hassan Palang, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. --Ronnnaldo7 (talk) 16:54, 11 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Transfermarkt

Since much of its content is user-edited, Transfermarkt is not considered a reliable source. Please do not cite the website in articles. Thank you. Sir Sputnik (talk) 02:48, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its content is edited by the user, but it is checked by admins before publication. In addition, just like Wikipedia, users are not approved by admins without providing the source of their edits. Transfermarket is the most famous football site in the world and its information is up-to-date.

Please confirm it as a valid source. Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi (talk) 07:20, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Annh07 (talk) 03:10, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar

The article Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 17:33, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a source from Transfermarket website Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi (talk) 20:05, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove Biographies of Living Persons PRODs without addressing the issue, as you did at Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:25, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You seem to be incapable of reading and following basic instructions, so let me make this clearer, as you've already been told Transfermarkt is not a reliable source and removal of a BLPPROD requires a reliable source if no source was present to begin with. If you remove it again, you will likely be blocked, so I suggest you learn to use article talk pages and utilize our well written guidelines and essays that guide you in finding sources. GRINCHIDICAE🎄 19:27, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There is a source from Transfermarket website. Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi (talk) 19:52, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Its content is edited by the user, but it is checked by admins before publication. In addition, just like Wikipedia, users are not approved by admins without providing the source of their edits. Transfermarket is the most famous football site in the world and its information is up-to-date.

Please confirm it as a valid source. Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi (talk) 19:54, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The review by community volunteers does not change Transfermarkt's character as a self-published source, and has long been confirmed as such per WP:WPFLINKSNO. Citing an unreliable source, believing it to be reliable is an honest mistake, but continuing to do so after that mistake has been pointed out to you several times is disruptive. If you keep doing this you may be blocked from editing. Sir Sputnik (talk) 20:36, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is wrong to consider Transfermarket as your unreliable source.

It's like Wikipedia but different.

Before publishing, the admins will check it, if it is wrong, it will not be published. Amirhosseinshiroodbakhshi (talk) 21:18, 24 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar

The article Hossein Hassanpour Shirsavar has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I support this BLP PROD and the addition of Transfermarkt does nothing to change this

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons. You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 14:04, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]