User talk:Annajeanne

License tagging for File:Eleanor McEvoy - 'If You Leave. .' - album sleeve artwork.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eleanor McEvoy - 'If You Leave. .' - album sleeve artwork.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 02:05, 21 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added what I think is the correct tag. Could you please direct me to the right tag if this is wrong. Thanks for your help Annajeanne (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, where did you receive the image from?

File permission problem with File:Eleanor_McEvoy_promo_picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eleanor_McEvoy_promo_picture.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 19:52, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have added what I think is the correct tag. Could you please direct me to the right tag if this is wrong. Thanks for your help Annajeanne (talk) 23:00, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:This_is_promo_picture_of_Eleanor_Mcevoy.png

Thanks for uploading File:This_is_promo_picture_of_Eleanor_Mcevoy.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 19:53, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Eleanor McEvoy promo picture.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Eleanor McEvoy promo picture.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 20:08, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi thanks for resonding - I added this tag

This image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the work or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. It is believed that the use of low-resolution images of such covers

solely to illustrate the audio recording in question,
on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation,

qualifies as fair use under the copyright law of the United States. Any other uses of this image, on Wikipedia or elsewhere, may be copyright infringement. See Wikipedia:Non-free content for more information.
Fair use

- is this correct. I'll be glad to make any other changes necessary. Thanks for you help. Inga Annajeanne (talk) 17:06, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Stuff (Eleanor McEvoy album) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

single remixes and B-sides, and even some new material." <ref name="Get Ready to Rock">{{cite news|url=http://getreadytorock.me.uk/blog/2014/03/album-review-eleanor-mcevoy-stuff/|publisher=

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:36, 21 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Non-free rationale for File:EleanorMcEvoyStuff.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:EleanorMcEvoyStuff.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 15:51, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Annajeanne. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you.Deb (talk) 20:36, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:The Thomas Moore Project.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:The Thomas Moore Project.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 21:30, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Thomas Project

I have restored the original text for The Thomas Project as the best guess at what you are requesting. Since it has no references, it will probably be deleted unless you provide references. It appears that you first blanked the page, so that it was marked for deletion, and then requested that the page not be deleted. Please try to understand that this confuses Wikipedia editors and administrators and we are also trying. Robert McClenon (talk) 21:45, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, The Thomas Project (Eleanor McEvoy album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, The Thomas Project (Eleanor McEvoy album). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – The Thomas Moore Project (Eleanor McEvoy album). Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at The Thomas Moore Project (Eleanor McEvoy album). If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 00:24, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add soapboxing, promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Deb (talk) 11:56, 25 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of The Thomas Project (Eleanor McEvoy album)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on The Thomas Project (Eleanor McEvoy album) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:16, 26 June 2017 (UTC) https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Annajeanne&action=edit&section=10#[reply]

Cite error: A <ref> tag is missing the closing </ref> (see the help page).Annajeanne (talk) 01:08, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Would it be possible to put the page back up and let me put all of the information in? Or would it be better to start a completely new page. I had thought of just calling the page The Thomas Moore Project without adding Eleanor McEvoy album in parentheses-would that be a better way to go. I would really appreciate it if you would help me with this.

Thanks so much, Inga</ref> Annajeanne (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use an article as a way to try to communicate with a Wikipedia administrator. That is what talk pages are for, including this talk page, User talk:Annajeanne, and User talk:Deb. I had to tag your latest post for deletion. Also, please do not use Wikipedia to try to publicize a commercial venture, and it appears that the Thomas Moore Project by Eleanor McEvoy is a commercial venture by Ms. McEvoy. Wikipedia has strict policies about neutrality, as you continue to discover. If you need advice, please ask at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 00:29, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanor McEvoy

I've had an unsigned message on my talk page from someone called "Inga". Is that you? Why are you using two names? Deb (talk) 08:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deb has a good question. There is no rule against using three given names, or saying that a user name that is a given name has to be real (a user name that is a given name and a last name should be that of a real person with that name), but you are confusing things if you are Anna Jeanne Inga. In any case, please ask for advice at the Teahouse. Robert McClenon (talk) 14:41, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, In regards to the two names I was having trouble remembering my password so I switched to my daughters account. I use the Annajeanne (my daughter doesn't post to wikipedia anymore) exclusively now just to avoid confusion.

I'm sorry for the issues with the Thomas Moore page. Is it possible for you to reinstate it and fix it so it doesn't automatically bounce back to Eleanor McEvoy's main page. I have a new page written that doesn't read as advertisement (it really isn't that at all - it's meant to be information on the album in the same way the the pages for McEvoy's other albums are informational). I also have links to verify the information I would be putting up on the page.

I'm a librarian and I really respect wikipedia and always want my contributions to be useful to readers. Despite the number of entries I've made I still make mistakes but I'm always trying to improve my entries.

Thanks so much for your help, Inga Annajeanne (talk) 22:53, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The mistake you're making is writing articles that read like promotional material. Possibly you are borrowing the wording from somewhere else (which would be even worse as it could be a copyright violation). I've looked back over your earlier contributions and most of them seem to have this problem. However, the point you're being evasive about is whether you have a connection to Eleanor McEvoy. You don't seem to be writing articles about much else. So I have to ask you again to read Wikipedia:Conflict of interest, as well as Wikipedia:Notability and Wikipedia:Verifiability. And preferably, just use one account. Deb (talk) 15:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if it seems like I'm being evasive - I am a fan of Eleanor McEvoy. I have gone to see her perform many times and have talked to her at her shows-as many fans do. I started adding material about her when I saw nothing else existed. I've continued to add information about her as it comes up. As I mentioned I am a librarian and treat my posts on wikipedia in the same way I would do research for patrons in my library. I've never written reviews of her work anywhere and that isn't what I do here - I've attempted to be completely impartial on what I post. I consider her an artist of merit and when I write posts it's from that perspective. Once I get better at following the Wikipedia guidelines I'll probably branch out and post on other subjects. I hope this answers your questions.

I'm going to write a new post for the Thomas Moore page and I will put it up here to see if it meets the proper criteria.

Thanks again for all of your help.

Inga Annajeanne (talk) 16:14, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, The Thomas Moore Project has not been deleted, just redirected until you can provide a version that meets the criteria for inclusion. Deb (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The Thomas Moore Project.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The Thomas Moore Project.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:01, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]