User talk:Anonymous99747

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Anonymous99747! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Sam Sailor 16:02, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Maarten Nagtegaal for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maarten Nagtegaal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maarten Nagtegaal until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Fram (talk) 13:30, 30 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i know all this information personally from him Anonymous99747 (talk) 12:25, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hello, I'm Blue Edits. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Mia Nicolai seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Blue Edits (talk) 07:34, 31 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cor Dillen moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Cor Dillen. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and major structural problems. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cor Dillen (July 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Voorts were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cor Dillen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

voorts (talk/contributions) 21:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anonymous99747! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! voorts (talk/contributions) 21:38, 19 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Lili Paul-Roncalli

Hello, Anonymous99747. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Lili Paul-Roncalli, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:01, 28 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Hello, I'm Meena. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Bobby Brazier have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. – Meena • 16:36, 9 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lili Paul-Roncalli (September 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I think this is WP:TOOSOON.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lili Paul-Roncalli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 18:31, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lili Paul-Roncalli (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Get to Text does not seem to be a reliable source. The website is very badly made and there are no signs of an editorial team. Interviews are not independent sources. Please find more reliable and independent sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lili Paul-Roncalli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ca ^{talk to me!} 12:20, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Lili Paul-Roncalli (September 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

I will go through each source in turn and explain why they are not appropriate:

1) an interview with her father, so not an independent source. 2) very basic coverage of her time on a TV show 3) an interview with her, so not independent 4) a WP:PRIMARY source

5) a WP:PRIMARY source

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Lili Paul-Roncalli and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 15:36, 3 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

September 2023

Please stop adding Dillen family members into multiple articles. Thank you.

Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:7010:DDC5:E734:17EB (talk) 15:59, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

An additional note: an encyclopedia isn't a gossip magazine. We're not interested in adoring mention of people's enormous wealth and jewelry. [1]. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:7010:DDC5:E734:17EB (talk) 16:48, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please start reading the above notes.

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. 2601:19E:4180:6D50:8C8:D8ED:F742:6DB4 (talk) 16:09, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Cor Dillen

Hello, Anonymous99747. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Cor Dillen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:15, 14 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Haagen

Speedy deletion nomination of Haagen (surname)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Haagen (surname), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Otuọcha (talk) 17:27, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"wealthy" and "billionaire"

Hello. Please stop adding the words "wealthy" and "billionaire" before people's parents names where there is no reference to it in the source. If it is indeed the case that their parents are billionaires, you will need to add a source to prove it per WP:V. Thank you. — ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 08:08, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Me again. Please stop adding content without sources to biographies of living people, like adding "relatively rich" and "former employee of TV1" to Blanka (Polish singer). Anything added to a biography of a living person NEEDS a source. This isn't an optional thing, this is Wikipedia policy per WP:BLP. Thanks. ser! ^{(chat to me - see my edits)} 09:38, 4 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

Hello, Anonymous99747. I noticed that your recent edit to Miles Nazaire added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. Sam Sailor 16:01, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Anonymous99747/sandbox

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as User:Anonymous99747/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Drmies (talk) 12:57, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

i just use the sandbox for harmless fun, for my fantasy games of entertainment shows Anonymous99747 (talk) 12:59, 26 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]