User talk:Anusmartmirror

This is Anusmartmirror's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusua Das (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CanonNi was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

We can't cite IMDB (WP:IMDB), and the ToI article does not mention Das.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anusua Das and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

'''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Anusmartmirror! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 11:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

This is your only warning; if you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising again, as you did at Draft:Anusua Das, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 16:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Which part of the content do you think is coming out as soapboxing or advertising, please let me know, I will take that out Anusmartmirror (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In my first submission, I was told there are no valid references/external links. Hence, I added additional details Anusmartmirror (talk) 16:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anusua Das (May 17)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by HitroMilanese were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Please see WP:NACTOR.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anusua Das and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 17:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 18:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anusmartmirror (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,I am writing to request the unblock of my account and the associated IP address. I sincerely apologize for the mistakes I made and would like to explain the circumstances in hopes of resolving this issue.Initial Article Submission: As a new contributor, I created an article for the first time. The article was declined due to insufficient references. In my attempt to address the feedback, I mistakenly added numerous references and content that appeared promotional, which was not my intention.Resulting Block: My actions were interpreted as self-promotion, leading to my account being blocked indefinitely. I understand now that my edits did not meet Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and verifiability.Creation of a New Account: Unaware of the proper appeal process, I created a new account to continue contributing, which resulted in my IP address being blocked for sock puppetry. This was an honest mistake, born out of a misunderstanding of Wikipedia’s policies, with no intention to circumvent the rules.Commitment to Improvement: Since then, I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines and now have a clear understanding of the importance of neutral, well-sourced content and the proper procedures for appealing blocks. I am committed to following all guidelines and contributing positively to the community.I respectfully request the opportunity to demonstrate my good faith and willingness to comply with Wikipedia’s standards. Please consider unblocking my account and IP address so I can continue to contribute constructively.Thank you for your understanding and consideration.Sincerely, Anusmartmirror Anusmartmirror (talk) 01:53, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Chatbot generated requests are not considered. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 05:59, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anusmartmirror (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Genuinely not trying for advertising or promotion. I am new user and have gone through the guildelines now. My last submission was a lot more refined and removed any words that might appear promotional. Requesting you to kindly unblock

Decline reason:

In that case, Wikipedia isn't the place for you. It certainly isn't the place for you to be promoting Anusua Das. Additionally, your username is pretty offensive. Yamla (talk) 18:22, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Yamla: I'm assuming that Anusmartmirror is Anusua Das. I also don't think the username is intended to be offensive. Perhaps "Anu" is a nickname for her.--Bbb23 (talk) 20:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This is plausible. Gotta love those cultural naming differences. --Yamla (talk) 20:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Confirmed block evasion as Khan2004kashf. --Yamla (talk) 00:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yamla thanks for clarifying. About the user name,I am actually making a smart mirror and naming it after her. Hence the user name. Never meant it to be offensive. Link for creation of smart mirror I am making https://www.raspberrypi.com/how-to-build-a-super-slim-smart-mirror/ Anusmartmirror (talk) 02:09, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anusmartmirror (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Administrators,I am writing to request the unblock of my account and the associated IP address. I sincerely apologize for the mistakes I made and would like to explain the circumstances in hopes of resolving this issue.Initial Article Submission: As a new contributor, I created an article for the first time. The article was declined due to insufficient references. In my attempt to address the feedback, I mistakenly added numerous references and content that appeared promotional, which was not my intention.Resulting Block: My actions were interpreted as self-promotion, leading to my account being blocked indefinitely. I understand now that my edits did not meet Wikipedia’s standards for neutrality and verifiability.Creation of a New Account: Unaware of the proper appeal process, I created a new account to continue contributing, which resulted in my IP address being blocked for sock puppetry. This was an honest mistake, born out of a misunderstanding of Wikipedia’s policies, with no intention to circumvent the rules.Commitment to Improvement: Since then, I have thoroughly reviewed Wikipedia’s guidelines and now have a clear understanding of the importance of neutral, well-sourced content and the proper procedures for appealing blocks. I am committed to following all guidelines and contributing positively to the community.I respectfully request the opportunity to demonstrate my good faith and willingness to comply with Wikipedia’s standards. Please consider unblocking my account and IP address so I can continue to contribute constructively.Thank you for your understanding and consideration.Sincerely

Decline reason:

Please only make one unblock request at a time. Sir Sputnik (talk) 03:50, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Courtesy note: Identified as 91% AI-generated by GPT Zero. '''[[User:CanonNi]]''' (talk • contribs) 02:22, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Canon

I am from IT background and an avid GPT user for my professional work. Maybe that is getting reflected in my day to day writing also. Apologies for any inconvenience caused. Anusmartmirror (talk) 02:37, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]