User talk:Ariveria

August 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I noticed that in this edit to Exotec, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Materialscientist, Sorry for this mistake. I was trying to link the English page to the WikiData page… i reviled de content by mistake. Thanks for your support! Ariveria (talk) 15:06, 12 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ariveria. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Exotec, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Ariveria. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Ariveria|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 10:32, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @David Gerard, thank you for giving me more informations about Wikimedia Terms of Use & best practices within the Wikipedia Community. In accordance to those terms, I've updated my profile to let readers know more my employer. Ariveria (talk) 15:10, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Exotec

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Exotec, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MrsSnoozyTurtle 08:59, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Daer @MrsSnoozyTurtle

With regard to the deletion of the page Exotec

I wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement.

This page was deleted under section G11 while it was compliant with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements and mentioning Reliable_sources. Ariveria (talk) 11:43, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ariveria. Unfortunately I can't see the deleted article. Best contact an admin to see if they can send you a copy. Regards, MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:52, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Reply

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation or company, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, logs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the company or organisation claims or interviewing its management. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls
The notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:

significant coverage in
independent,
multiple,
reliable,
secondary sources.

Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability.

Most of your refs appear to be company press releases or similar, not geuine third-party sources. You also concentrate on the company's history and what it sells, but you don't say for instance, how many employees it has, or anything about turnover or profit

You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.

It's promotional because you present us with claims that are largely just what the company says, rather than verifiable facts

There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organisation, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

The company is clearly notable, and I've seen worse, so I'll recreate at Draft:Exotec so that you can add missing facts and find proper refs to independent third party sources, which may involve shortening the text. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 08:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Exotec moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Exotec, has been moved back into draftspace. Since you are a paid editor, you should not edit articles directly, but request others to edit. When creating a new article, that would include not moving articles into mainspace yourself. You need to go through an AfC review. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:15, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you @Onel5969 ! I'll follow this procedure. Ariveria (talk) 17:49, 16 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Exotec (March 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Slywriter was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Routine business transactions, relevant to an investor but not to a reader of an encyclopedia

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Exotec and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Exotec, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Slywriter (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ariveria! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Slywriter (talk) 16:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Exotec

Hello, Ariveria. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Exotec".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:34, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]