User talk:Artisforme

License tagging for File:AJCasson1982.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AJCasson1982.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:06, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:AJCassonMakette.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:AJCassonMakette.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:55, 26 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A. J. Casson Award[edit]

I worked some on the A. J. Casson Award and a bit on Canadian Society of Painters in Water Colour. I think you've done some good work. It appears that you do have somewhat of a Conflict of Interest on these pages (but then don't we all on the pages that we really care about), so you may want to add your connection with the CSPWC to your user page. This does *not* mean that you are limited from working on these pages, but merely to recognize that they aren't 'yours' and that others can and should edit them as well. BTW, what the article *really* needs is a reference for the Award Recipients (a book or a web page that actually says that Ray Cattell won it in 1975, etc.) Unfortunately, I don't know the proper procedure to keep the image of the medal from being removed for copyright issues, perhaps you could ask on the help page. I really hope to see you around Wikipedia.Naraht (talk) 18:38, 4 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:CSPWC CanHs.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:CSPWC CanHs.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 22:36, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Royal Collection Project[edit]

I moved it back to Royal Collection Project as that appears to be its WP:COMMONNAME. – ukexpat (talk) 19:58, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is a specific important Canadian project. This must be indicated in the title. At least the word "Canada" and/or "CSPWC" please. Australia did a similar project. Suggestions welcome. Artisforme (talk) 20:07, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment there is no need for disambiguation. If and when an article is created about the Australian project we can think about how to deal with it. – ukexpat (talk) 20:17, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comments. I'm afraid the article title may give the impression that this body of work is from the UK, but as mentioned, it is a Canadian project, so that should be clear. Suggestions welcome please.Artisforme (talk) 20:38, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Artisforme, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 05:33, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Visual Art[edit]

WikiProject Visual arts

You are welcome to join WikiProject Visual arts, a collaboration between like-minded Wikipedians in order to improve visual arts coverage.

Sarah (talk) 05:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 19:28, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

December 2013[edit]

Hello, I'm DVdm. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page A. Y. Jackson because it seemed inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thanks. DVdm (talk) 16:42, 1 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 17:25, 25 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten[edit]

Hello Artisforme. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Anthony J. Batten".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Anthony J. Batten}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Anthony J. Batten has been accepted[edit]

Anthony J. Batten, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Kvng (talk) 22:13, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Arctic Quest (February 13)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by S0091 were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission reads more like an essay than an encyclopedia article. Submissions should summarise information in secondary, reliable sources and not contain opinions or original research. Please write about the topic from a neutral point of view in an encyclopedic manner.

The comment the reviewer left was:

No sources. External links do not belong in the body of an article so need to be removed. If they are intended to be sources, then cite them. Please see this guide for how to cite sources. Also, need to be rewritten in an encyclopedic tone and summarize what the sources state. Quotes should be very limited and a list of statements is not appropriate.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Arctic Quest and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Arctic Quest, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

S0091 (talk) 21:24, 13 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Arctic Quest[edit]

Hello, Artisforme. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Arctic Quest, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:01, 3 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Arctic Quest[edit]

Hello, Artisforme. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Arctic Quest".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:30, 3 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]