User talk:Ash20055

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. Ecrusized (talk) 18:10, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/turkish-soldiers-killed-pkk-ambush-southeast-army. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly and verifiably has been released to the world under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license or into the public domain and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

User:Ash20055/sandbox may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ash20055! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:25, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 21:42, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ash20055 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Wikipedia Moderators, I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to respectfully request the lifting of the block placed on my Wikipedia account. I deeply regret any actions or behaviors that may have led to my account being blocked, and I assure you that I understand the importance of adhering to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. I have been an avid contributor and editor on Wikipedia for a considerable period of time, and I genuinely value the platform as a valuable resource for information and knowledge sharing. My intention has always been to contribute positively to the community by providing accurate and reliable information to the best of my abilities. I acknowledge that there may have been instances where my contributions did not meet the high standards set forth by Wikipedia. However, I assure you that I am committed to learning from any mistakes I may have made and improving my editing skills accordingly. I am more than willing to familiarize myself with any updated guidelines or policies that have been implemented since my block. I understand that Wikipedia relies on its community of dedicated editors and moderators to maintain the integrity and quality of its content. As such, I am fully willing to collaborate and communicate with other editors to ensure that my future contributions align with Wikipedia's standards. I will actively seek feedback and guidance from experienced editors to ensure that my edits are accurate, neutral, and properly sourced. If given the opportunity, I will approach my editing responsibilities on Wikipedia with utmost care and diligence, ensuring that I adhere to the core principles of neutrality, verifiability, and reliability. I am eager to continue contributing to the collective knowledge base and to help maintain the integrity of Wikipedia as a valuable resource for millions of users worldwide. I kindly request that you review my case and consider lifting the block on my account. I assure you that I will conduct myself in a responsible and respectful manner, always striving to contribute positively to the community and upholding Wikipedia's high standards. Thank you for taking the time to consider my appeal. I genuinely appreciate your dedication to maintaining the quality and integrity of Wikipedia. I look forward to the possibility of being reinstated as an editor and contributing to the platform once again. Sincerely, Ash20055 Ash20055 (talk) 21:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Now try writing an unblock request yourself rather than cutting and pasting from a chatbot. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:46, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ash20055 (talk) 21:12, 25 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]