User talk:At-Bankikodla

Welcome!

Hi At-Bankikodla! I noticed your contributions to Anandashram High School, Bankikodla and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Wareon (talk) 19:06, 2 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranjan N. Naik (May 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:At-Bankikodla/Ranjan N. Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:At-Bankikodla/Ranjan N. Naik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, At-Bankikodla! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 18:36, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Gourish Kaikini

added a link pointing to Gokarna

Jayanth Kaikini

added a link pointing to Gokarna

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 27 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranjan N. Naik (May 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Felix QW was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for academics). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There really are no indications here of passing WP:NPROF. Citation counts are low even for pure mathematics, he seems to have been active in research only from 1977 to 1985 and I can't find any reason he would be notable under any of the other criteria.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ranjan N. Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ranjan N. Naik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Felix QW (talk) 14:29, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

One may say I am somewhat new to Wikipedia editing and am learning new things on notability criteria for professors to become Wikipedia notable. Yes, for Ranjan N. Naik, the numbers are low, thanks for letting me know. It looks like he was not in academia after completing a PhD in 1977 until 2004. I may have to find out where he was other than in academia. I have some evidence that he was in software engineering and tried to come back to academia teaching and research around in 2004. He may have one or two papers after that which are not substantial to list. I have noticed in Wikipedia that for some just one contribution making him/her Wikipedia notable. Naik may be Wikipedia notable should you look at just Ranjan Naik’s paper “Intersection Graphs of linear hypergraphs”. In addition, as such, a famous mathematician Claude Berge cites Naik’s work in his well-known book on hypergraphs: Combinatorics of finite sets, Translated from the French, North-Holland Mathematical Library, 45. North-Holland Publishing Co., Amsterdam, 1989.

The work-in-process on the survey paper “Intersection Graphs of Graphs and Hypergraphs” from Researchgate.com may be an evidence that Ranjan Naik has been active in the field to some extent. I speculate that it could pick up substantial readings and references in the future. He is a 1952 born; I do not foresee any significant contributions of him on the horizon.

Having said all these, I do not know at this point whether I have to continue editing his page or submit for a deletion. However, I would like to ask you to see his numbers just on Intersection Graphs of Graphs and Hypergraphs qualify him for notability. It is better to delete it sooner rather than later.

Thanks. At-Bankikodla (talk) 22:30, 29 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Hello, I'm Wikipelli. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Gokarna, Karnataka—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Wikipelli ^Talk 00:02, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sir, it is the truth. Thanks. At-Bankikodla (talk) 00:04, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You will need to include a reference to a reliable source if you wish to add this information to an article. It appears to be an opinion and that is not permitted. Wikipelli ^Talk 00:06, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You look at the water and the steps. Many have died there. Everyone knows that who go there. Do not get offended. Truth remains truth. At-Bankikodla (talk) 00:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ranjan N. Naik (May 30)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Gusfriend was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ranjan N. Naik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ranjan N. Naik, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Gusfriend (talk) 01:31, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete the page. At-Bankikodla (talk) 03:18, 30 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Naadumaskeri, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gokarna.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:00, 3 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]