User talk:Atharvnannu
April 2021
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gattu have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Gattu was changed by Atharvnannu (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.908794 on 2021-04-14T14:19:31+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:19, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 22:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
Atharvnannu, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Atharvnannu! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC) |
Sockpuppet investigation
[edit]
An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Atharvgoyalgoyal, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.
Zai (💬 • 📝 • ⚡️) 15:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
I know how to edit Wikipedia. I have read the full article of Wikipedia article creation. This is my first account. I am not using multiple accounts. Atharvnannu (talk) 02:03, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
It is just a mere coincidence that the name "Atharv" in both accounts is common. I'm not using multiple accounts. Please stop suspecting me. Atharvnannu (talk) 02:11, 17 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021
[edit]
Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice:
{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.