User talk:Azhara S Ashraf

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Azhara S Ashraf, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Mathglot (talk) 11:35, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm MrOllie. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bill.com seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 14:36, 9 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Jasmine, you may be blocked from editing. Zefr (talk) 06:31, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Exploring The Science Of Color[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Exploring The Science Of Color. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Color. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Color. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. MrOllie (talk) 14:10, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. Also, please don't source article content from unreliable sources such as blog posts. Much of the material in the blog from which you copied is simply wrong. JBW (talk) 15:23, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Seeing the copying you did in the article Exploring The Science Of Color prompted me to check other editing of yours. In every case that I have checked where you added a significant amount of text to an article, you substantially copied text from other web sites, changing the exact wording, but staying so close to the original, sentence by sentence, as to leave no doubt whatever about the copying. Slightly changing the wording of text, but staying so close to it that nobody seeing the two versions together can fail to see the copying, is not enough to avoid infringing copyright. To give just one example, you replaced "mystery of its production is a family gift handed over through generations" with "mystery of its production has been passed down through the generations". That might get overlooked for an individual sentence, but doing it sentence after sentence for several paragraphs is not acceptable, especially if you do the same thing in multiple articles. Please post only material which you have substantially written yourself, in your own words, not text lifted from other writers and slightly rephrased. JBW (talk) 16:02, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]