User talk:BIG MAN 69123
May 2019
[edit]
Hello, I'm Petrb. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Porsche 911— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Petrb (talk) 15:53, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Eric Bledsoe. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Everedux (talk) 21:59, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Derrick Henry, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Derrick Henry was changed by BIG MAN 69123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.867073 on 2019-05-02T22:19:43+00:00
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 22:19, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- Lofty abyss 22:23, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
BIG MAN 69123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am very sorry for vandalizing Wikipedia. If I am given the honor of being unblocked, I promise to behave myself and to be a productive Wikipedia user. I hope that you can forgive me for my disgraceful actions. If you cannot, that is okay but if I am unblocked and I keep vandalizing then you can disable my account. Please unblock me. BIG MAN 69123 (talk) 23:22, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
No. Your homophobic edits show you have no place here. Come back in a few years when you have grown up. Yamla (talk) 23:37, 2 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
BIG MAN 69123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I totally understand. However, what I said was not intended to be homophobic (Pedro Sánchez is obviously not homosexual, I wrote that as a joke). It was instead just a childish remark that I should not have made. Regardless, I do know that my behavior was inappropriate. I guarantee you I will not do anything of this nature anymore on Wikipedia if I am unblocked. I made a bad choice and I am accepting the consequences, but I don't feel that it is necessary for me to have to be blocked forever. I only made a few edits, and while I admit that they were indeed vandalism, I have learned my lesson and I believe that I at least deserve a second chance. I am willing to be mature and only post edits if they are constructive and true. As I stated earlier, if I am unblocked and continue to be immature and unproductive, then you can just ban me. I know that if I am given a second chance, I will take advantage of the opportunity and make things right. Please at least consider this.
Decline reason:
Every one of your edits has been stupid vandalism, and there is no acceptable "I was only messing about" excuse. Try the Standard Offer and see if you are sufficiently mature in six months - right now you are clearly not. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 17:01, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.