User talk:Bagunceiro

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources
Edwin Brock
Brazilian military government
Regions of Brazil
Kapaa High School
Afonso Pena
Northeast Region, Brazil
Politics of Brazil
Ronson (company)
São Paulo (state)
Index of Brazil-related articles
Getúlio Vargas
Portuguese Brazilian
Race and ethnicity in Brazil
Lèse majesté in Thailand
The Wrythe
Media of Ireland
White Brazilian
Antônio de Barros Carvalho
Yeda Pessoa de Castro
João Pimenta da Veiga Filho
Colonial Brazil
History of the Jews in Brazil
Francesc Xavier Bultó
Vice President of Brazil
Pedralva, Minas Gerais
Café Filho
Delfim Moreira, Minas Gerais
Sistema Único de Saúde

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 7 May 2014 (UTC)

Pound sterling[edit]

Many thanks for the revert - I clicked when I shouldn't have clicked (distractions!! ...) Regards Denisarona (talk) 14:07, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

@Denisarona: Been there, done that ;-) Bagunceiro (talk) 14:27, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Henrique Bernadelli[edit]

Hello, Bagunceiro. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Henrique Bernadelli, for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. If you don't want Henrique Bernadelli to be deleted, please add a reference to the article.

If you don't understand this message, you can leave a note on my talk page.

Thanks, TheMagikCow (talk) 18:15, 29 July 2014 (UTC)

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Chamber of Deputies (Brazil) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • }}

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

Re: Goianá[edit]

It doesn't make much sense to call any Brazilian city both "a town and a municipality". The way it was written, it seemed like "town" and "municipality" were two different things, or that it is possible to be a "town" or a "municipality" in Brazil. However, Brazil is officially divided in states and municipalities, so that's why I've been changing thousands of articles that were wrongly created following this formula:

"Name of the city is a town and municipality in the state of...".

The correct definition of any Brazilian city is "municipality". We have no "towns", the closest word for that would be "city", which is a generic and frequently informal term for any city in the world. Victão Lopes Fala! 02:06, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

Reference errors on 24 April[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:20, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Brazilian States[edit]

Hi Bagunceiro, I updated all of the images of the states so that they looked more modern and standardised. I'll be happy to take any considerations about changing the colours if you had any. Santiago — Preceding unsigned comment added by SantiagoFrancoRamos (talkcontribs) 08:21, 3 August 2015 (UTC)

Pound Sterling[edit]

Although I appreciate your good faith on the article, the previous version was misleading, I'll mode the discussion from Twobell's talk page to the article talk page. (N0n3up (talk) 18:54, 15 October 2015 (UTC))

ANI notice[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Removing prod[edit]

Thankfully another editor is working on the article now to source it. Hopefully you will do the same. In the future, please don't remove prods [1] unless you are also going to improve the article. :) - CorbieV 19:18, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

@CorbieVreccan:, suggest you read the instructions at WP:Prod. Specifically:
" Any editor (including the article's creator) may object to the deletion by simply removing the tag; this action permanently cancels the proposed deletion via PROD"
"To object to and therefore permanently prevent a proposed deletion, remove the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from the article"
and also
"Proposed deletion (PROD) is a way to suggest an article for 'uncontroversial' deletion"
Or even just the text of the "PROD" itself:
"You may remove this message if you improve the article or otherwise object to deletion for any reason."
Bagunceiro (talk) 20:59, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Happy New Year, Bagunceiro![edit]

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

Date articles[edit]

Hi. Please have a look at Boomer Vial's edit history - a concerted campaign to add as many American actors as possible to these articles as he can, regardless of notability, and he's even doing it in alphabetical order. Deb (talk) 19:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)

Reference errors on 20 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Pound sterling[edit]

Hello, you are incorrect - the island of Ireland is not British and the pound sterling is not the currency in the Republic of Ireland. Regards Denisarona (talk) 04:44, 2 May 2016 (UTC)

@Denisarona: The island of Ireland has nothing to do with the case, and the republic even less so. I assume you must be confusing the term British Islands with British Isles; a different thing altogether. United Kingdom is incorrect in this case since the sterling zone includes (as shown on the map) the Channel Islands and Mann; neither of which are part of the UK. I suppose it might not be a bad idea to spell it out as "the United Kingdom, the Channel Islands and the Isle of Mann" or similar, but that is a bit wordy. Bagunceiro (talk) 12:41, 2 May 2016 (UTC)