User talk:Bantosh

This user may have left Wikipedia. Bantosh has not edited Wikipedia since February 2013. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Welcome!

Hello, Bantosh, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions; I hope you like it here and decide to stay. We're glad to have you in our community! Here are a few good links for newcomers:

If you haven't already, drop by the new user log and tell others a bit about yourself.
Always sign your posts on talk pages with ~~~~ so others will know who left which comments.
The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
Our policies, guidelines, and simplified ruleset
How to edit a page and write a great article
The Wikipedia tutorial and picture tutorial
The handy Manual of Style
And finally, remember to be bold in updating pages!

I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian. Although we all make mistakes, please keep in mind what Wikipedia is not. If you have any questions or concerns, don't hesitate to see the help pages or add a question to the village pump. The Community Portal can also be very useful.

Happy editing!

-- Sango 123 18:26, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

P.S. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you need help with anything or simply wish to say hello. :)

Image Tagging Image:Cb web site2.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Cb web site2.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Shyam ^(T/C) 14:44, 3 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bryce Britt

Hi. You created a redirect titled "Bryce Britt" to the article on Stress. If this is a personal attack or a joke on someone you know, please stop. If Bryce Britt is someone famous please create an article on the person instead of a redirect to another article that makes no mention of him. If you are new and "trying out" Wikipedia by performing tests please use the sandbox for any future tests. Thanks. - Tεx τ urε 20:23, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Coca cola can hebrew.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Coca cola can hebrew.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Jeff 19:20, 3 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Har Habayit warning photo

I have a question about the photo you uploaded that is on the temple mount page. The Hebrew appears to have been vandalized. What did the original Hebrew say and is the vandalized version of the sign currently on display? Rabbi-m 04:18, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FU

Please do not add fair-use images to articles without adhering to their license and without providing a detailed hand-written fair-use rationale justifying their use. Your changes to Brad Pitt were reverted as the changes violated WP:FU. --Yamla 18:02, 20 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your change to Pee Wee Herman

rmv "website" header- how do you have an internet link to anything but websites?

lol Gravee 20:43, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Trivia tags

When adding {{trivia}}s to articles, please put them at the top of the page, per the content of the template ("This article contains a trivia section..."). Thanks. - Dudesleeper · Talk 21:30, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jingle All the Way

I lowered the protection for Jingle All the Way, in case you still are interesting in editing it. -- Jreferee ^(Talk) 18:40, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Casino soundtrack cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Casino soundtrack cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 21:46, 29 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Big Lie (The Adventures of McGee and Me)

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Big Lie (The Adventures of McGee and Me), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Big Lie (The Adventures of McGee and Me). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 22:25, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Call Me Mister (book)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Call Me Mister (book), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call Me Mister (book). Thank you. Schuym1 (talk) 18:17, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An article you created maybe deleted soon: Tools which can help you

The article you created, Call_Me_Mister_(book) maybe deleted from Wikipedia.

There is an ongoing debate about whether your article should be deleted here:

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Call_Me_Mister_(book).

The faster your respond, the better chance the article you created can be saved. This is because deletion debates only stay open for a few days, and the first comments are usually the most important.

There are several tools and other editors who can help you keep the page from being deleted forever:

You can list the page up for deletion on Article Rescue Squadron. If you need help listing your page, add a comment on the Article Rescue Squadron talk page.
You can request a mentor to help explain to you all of the complex rules that editors use to get a page deleted, here: Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User. But don't wait for a mentor to respond on the deletion page.
When try to delete a page, veteran editors love to use a lot of rule acronyms. Don't let these acronyms intimidate you.
Here is a list of your own acronyms you can use yourself: WP:Deletion debate acronyms which may support the page you created being kept.
Acronyms in deletion debates are sometimes incorrectly used, or ignore rules or exceptions.
You can merge the article into a larger or better established article on the same topic.

If your page is deleted, you still have many options available. Good luck! travb (talk) 21:37, 31 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Age of Reason

Hi. A little over a year ago you made an edit to The Age of Reason, which was immediately reverted. You might wish to look at Talk:The Age of Reason#Michael Moore and maybe get involved with the article again. SamuelTheGhost (talk) 14:25, 1 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:The-manster-eye.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as:

File:The-manster-eye.jpg

is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions, please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Theo's Little Bot (error?) 08:55, 14 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:The-manster-title-card.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The-manster-title-card.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:49, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Judy Starr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Judy Starr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judy Starr until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Howicus (Did I mess up?) 22:44, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:05, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:The-manster-eye.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:The-manster-eye.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Monkey-ed Movies

The article Monkey-ed Movies has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Sources are about Chimp Channel, not Monkey-ed Movies. Program blocks are rarely notable on their own

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 01:43, 23 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Monkey-ed Movies for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Monkey-ed Movies is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Monkey-ed Movies until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 15:26, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]