User talk:Bbsalexa2366

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alexa Ilacad have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alexa Ilacad was changed by Bbsalexa2366 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.938965 on 2021-12-02T16:49:45+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:49, 2 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Alexa Ilacad have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Alexa Ilacad was changed by Bbsalexa2366 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.865273 on 2021-12-24T01:34:26+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:34, 24 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alexa Ilacad, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 23:45, 24 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bbsalexa2366 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Caught by an open proxy block but this host or IP is not an open proxy. My IP address is 136.158.10.121. Place any further information here. Bbsalexa2366 (talk) 19:57, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Confirmed P2P proxy. Yamla (talk) 20:07, 9 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2022

Hello, Bbsalexa2366. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Alexa Ilacad, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dl2000 (talk) 20:13, 5 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of KD Estrada

The article KD Estrada has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Hariboneagle927 (talk) 04:20, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

May 2022

Although everyone is welcome to edit Wikipedia, some of your recent edits to Flex were not considered constructive. These edits constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Mark in wiki (talk) 10:06, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Alexa Ilacad, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. NewManila2000 (talk) 11:13, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not italicize the production company, director and the name of the characters that were being portrayed by the actors/actresses in a film/television series, just like what you have done in Santigwar. NewManila2000 (talk) 11:27, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely for advertising or promotion and violating the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use. This is because you have been making promotional edits to topics in which you have a financial stake, yet you have failed to adhere to the mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a form of conflict of interest (COI) editing which involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is strictly prohibited. Using this site for advertising or promotion is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, please read our guide to appealing blocks to understand more about unblock requests, and then add the text {{unblock|reason=your reason here ~~~~}} at the end of your user talk page. For that request to be considered, you must:

Confirm that you have read and understand the Terms of Use and paid editing disclosure requirements.
State clearly how you are being compensated for your edits, and describe any affiliation or conflict of interest you might have with the subjects you have written about.
Describe how you intend to edit such topics in the future.

Jake Wartenberg (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bbsalexa2366 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have no intentions to promote products, nor am I paid to promote things. But I understand what I'm blocked for, and will make sure it does not happen again. Instead, I'll make sure to make productive contributions instead. Bbsalexa2366 (talk) 15:05, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This doesn't make sense. You're saying that you're not paid to edit Wikipedia, but you won't do it again in the future? NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 17:35, 3 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bbsalexa2366 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm really not paid to edit Wikipedia, and by saying 'I'll make sure it does not happen again', I meant I'll be more cautious with the edits I make so it does not get mistaken as a paid advertisement or whatnot because it truly isn't. Bbsalexa2366 (talk) 10:49, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You don't have to be specifically paid or asked to edit Wikipedia to be a paid editor; any paid relationship with a topic triggers the disclosure requirement. You don't have to be promoting, soliciting, or selling something. I've seen nothing here that suggests you aren't anything other than a paid editor. Perhaps if you wanted to edit about topics other than Filipino celebrities. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 20:06, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Ways to improve Santigwar

Hello, Bbsalexa2366,

Thank you for creating Santigwar.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Please add a reception section with details of reviews of the film in reliable sources

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Atlantic306}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Atlantic306 (talk) 12:32, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Santigwar (2019) promotional release poster.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Santigwar (2019) promotional release poster.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:29, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"SLAY" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect SLAY and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 8#SLAY until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. — Ⓜ️hawk10 (talk) 16:15, 8 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]