User talk:Belmin.agic

March 2023

Please stop. If you continue to use edit summaries that are misleading, intentionally or not, as you did at Hagia Sophia, you may be blocked from editing. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 23:20, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

Masjid al-Haram

added a link pointing to Ottoman

Zaseok, Sapna

added a link pointing to VRS

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:06, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sources and Edit Summaries

Hello. I see you've already been warned about using misleading edit summaries. Please do not summarise edits as "Fixed Typo" when it is clear that you are adding or altering content, and not fixing a typographical error. Mislabelling edits can be mistaken to be an attempt to conceal what you are doing, which is disruptive or vandalism. So it's important to be accurate in summaries.

Please also remember to cite reliable sources on added content. This is particularly important when adding information that is negative to a biography. You will find your edit gets reverted if you do not do this. Thanks. Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 14:56, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'd like to repeat the notice above: please do not summarize your edits as "fixed typo" when you are in fact adding or changing content, as you did recently at Mimar Sinan. Moreover, this edit at Islamic architecture actually added grammatical errors rather than fixing typos. If you're not fully confident in your English writing abilities, I'd suggest you refrain from making grammatical edits; you can always ask editors on the article talk page to look at parts of the article where you think there's a mistake but you're not sure how to fix it yourself. Either way, can you please make your edit summaries clearer and more accurate in the future? R Prazeres (talk) 15:12, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

PS: Your edits at Mimar Sinan also added unsourced content, some of which is clearly wrong, such as attributing the Bayezid II complexes in Edirne and Istanbul to Sedefkar Mehmed Agha, when they were built well before his time. Another reason to be clearer in your edit summaries, so potential mistakes are not overlooked. R Prazeres (talk) 15:20, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Belmin.agic, you've already had multiple warnings about this: please stop labelling your edits as "fixed typo" when you are not in fact fixing typos, as you did again here. If you do this again, intentionally or not, this could be considered disruptive editing and could even potentially get you blocked from editing. Can you please acknowledge this message and commit to writing more accurate edit summaries? R Prazeres (talk) 23:28, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep images proportionate to the scope of the topic

Hi Belmin.agic, please keep in mind that Wikipedia is a global encyclopedia, so when you're adding content, consider whether you're adding disproportionate attention to one very small part of that topic. It's entirely normal to be interested some specific topics, but keep in mind that articles must still have a worldwide view. In these edits at muqarnas ([1]) and ablaq ([2]), you added many images of one specific mosque in Sarajevo. In each topic there is a huge range of examples to draw from across the world, and this places exaggerated emphasis on one local monument. Have a look at the general guidelines for images at MOS:IMAGES and try to keep them in mind. In particular, note the first guideline that encourages pertinence and variety. So adding a new image to increase variety is fine, but adding 9 images of the same thing in an article of much wider scope (like you did at muqarnas) is not very reasonable. I hope this advice helps for your future edits. Thanks, R Prazeres (talk) 20:45, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 26

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Abjad, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aragonese.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 26 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. MrOllie (talk) 17:56, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Emperor's Mosque and Khosrow (word), you may be blocked from editing. R Prazeres (talk) 01:04, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 6

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Petition for Muslim worship at Mosque–Cathedral of Córdoba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 6 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]