User talk:Bigbee

==Welcome== Hello Bigbee and welcome to Wikipedia! I'm glad you've chosen to join us. This is a great project with lots of dedicated people, which might seem intimidating at times, but don't let anything discourage you. Be bold!, explore, and contribute. Try to be civil by following simple guidelines and signing your talk comments with ~~~~ but never forget that one of our central tenets is to ignore all rules.

If you want to learn more, Wikipedia:Tutorial is the place to go, but eventually the following links might also come in handy:
Help
FAQ
Glossary
Manual of Style

Float around until you find something that tickles your fancy. One easy way to do this is to hit the random page button in the navigation bar to the left. Additionally, the Community Portal offers a more structured way to become acquainted with the many great committees and groups that focus on specific tasks. My personal favorite stomping grounds are Wikipedia:Translation into English as well as the cleanup, welcoming, and counter-vandalism committees. Finally, the Wikimedia Foundation has several other wiki projects that you might enjoy. If you have any more questions, always feel free to ask me anything on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Draeco 19:20, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Anderson images

You uploaded an image claiming to depict a vial of the Duke of Edinburgh's blood, marking it {{pd-self}}. Could you please explain how you were able to take this photograph? -- The Anome 07:06, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have also uploaded numerous other images without giving source information, and thus your licensing information is unverifiable. You seem to confuse taking a screenshot with "creating a work": this is not the case. Unless you are very, very old, you could not possibly have created m the photographs you claim to have created yourself, apparently in the 1920s and 1930s. One image is a self-portrait of Anna Anderson; unless you are her, posting beyond the grave, this is unlikely to be your own work. I hope you can see why this makes me skeptical about your other unsourced PD claims. -- The Anome 07:09, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. What tag would I use if I got a screenshot from a boiography and cropped it?

License tagging for Image:Annaan.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Annaan.JPG. Wikipedia gets hundreds of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:04, 29 May 2006 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Cap135.JPG)

Thanks for uploading Image:Cap135.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 09:48, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Ana11.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you uploaded the same image twice: as Image:Ana11.jpg and also as Image:Ana.jpg. The latter copy of the file has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 07:02, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Grand Duchess Anastasia Nikolaevna of Russia

I have reverted your changes. The article has gone through an extensive peer review and featured article review with the Rasputin section included. The section on Rasputin belongs in the article. I also restored the photo dated circa 1915. It is most appropriate to use a photo of Anastasia as a teenager as the main picture instead of one of her as a young girl. --Bookworm857158367 12:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Annaan.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Annaan.JPG. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 16:14, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anna Anderson

You are in danger of violating the three-revert rule. Please cease further reverts or you may be blocked from editing.

You seem to be in a state of complete denial and ignorance about the reality of the proven imposter, Anna Anderson. She is merely one of many imposters who claimed to be the late Grand Duchess Anastasia. This is very well documented. I would suggest you desist in vandalising and removing fully referenced proven material and do some reading. You want to deny what has been recorded historically, especially by members of the Romanov family. You also cannot deny proven DNA evidence. It makes you look very foolish indeed. Anna Anderson now has to answer to a higher authority. She is dead and was never ever a member of the Romanov family. It's curious that Grand Duchess Anastasia was made a saint by the Russian Orthodox Church both abroad and in Russia. Both churches knew she had been murdered in Ekaterinburg. Documents held in the Russian State Archives prove it. (Talk) 10:00, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You ignore all the facts. The article clearly states DNA proved AA was not Anastasia, but it is not proven that Anastasia died, and just because AA may have been an imposter dosen't mean you need to use LIES to prove she was not. If you want to continue lieing, go right on ahead. But I hope people are smart enough to look up the actual sources instead of believing this false article.

AN's death has never been proved and this same church you speak of dosen't even believe the bones are authentic so what you say has no credibility jackass. Documents prove nothing. A body would. If you had a brain you would know this.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Template:Anna Anderson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. P.S. Your gross insults have been recorded and noted. I suggest before you do so again you actually read the sources to gain some knowledge about the imposter Anna Anderson and the real Grand Duchess Anastasia. There is a huge amount of evidence. I doubt the countless highly respected authors of the verified referenced information given would agree with you. If in doubt contact the Russian State Archives. (Aussiebrisguy) 11.11 27 May2007 (UTC)

You do nothing but put false information. Try reading a book for once and find out the REAL info about the imposter Anna Anderson. Correcting your false info is not vandalism. Obviously you've never read a book or seen the Russian state archives or you wouldn't be posting your fiction here.

Your lies and false information have also been noted.

Your repeated vandalism of Anna Anderson

Your account has been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for the following reason;

violating the three-revert rule.

Please see our blocking policy for more information. — Xy 7 12:17, 28 May 2007

Image:Annaan.JPG

I have tagged Image:Annaan.JPG as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 03:14, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for Image:Annaan.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Annaan.JPG. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talkpage. Thank you. Videmus Omnia ^Talk 13:28, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cap088.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cap088.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:39, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Cap128.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Cap128.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:41, 12 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ana11.jpg

The file File:Ana11.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 19 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Anna Anderson, self-portrait.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Anna Anderson, self-portrait.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{permission pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. Here is a list of your uploads. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 06:02, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]